Ten More Years?

The author first explored this topic in 2015, and this follow-up article was published in February:

Welcome to the Brave New Housing Cycle: Factors indicate that an extended housing boom is underway.

A new long-term housing boom is upon us. And COVID-19 is the main reason why.

Both housing and economic cycles used to last five to seven years, but the economy has shifted to longer cycles, due to factors such as technology and monetary policy. The housing market has followed suit and the result is what I have defined as the Brave New Housing Cycle, which is poised to last seven to 10 years.

The current Brave New Housing Cycle actually started last year.

Read full article here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuapollard/2021/02/03/the-housing-market-just-began-a-new-10-year-upward-move/

Max Sales Efficiency

Yesterday we saw that more than half of the NSDCC houses sold over the last couple of months have closed for a price that’s higher than their list price.

Another difference from previous years is the efficiency.

Typically, there are only around 55% to 60% of the listings that actually sell each year – mostly due to agents re-freshing their listings repeatedly, sellers changing their mind, and wrong pricing.

What a huge difference in the Covid Era.

We have fewer homes for sale, but more of them are selling:

NSDCC Listings Between December 1st and January 31st

Year
Number of Listings
Number of Listings Pending or Sold By March 12th
%
2020
526
253
48%
2021
460
328
71%

Before Covid was declared, we had come into 2020 with low rates and renewed optimism, and the market was active as participants were finding their way, price-wise. There were 48% of the early listings that found a buyer before Covid kicked in on March 12th.

This year, the higher-end market is healthy, but the Under-$2,000,000 is blistering hot:

NSDCC Listings Under $2,000,000 Between December 1st and January 31st

Year
Number of Listings Under $2M
Number of Listings Pending or Sold By March 12th
%
2020
329
206
63%
2021
237
210
89%

89%!

When you are telling your grandkids about THE GREATEST REAL ESTATE FRENZY OF ALL-TIME, come back to this page!

Over List, April (First Half)

The trend of paying over the list price continues!

NSDCC Detached-Home Sales, % Closed Over List Price

January: 38%

February: 43%

March: 53%

1/2April: 57%

Most sellers and agents are happy just to get 1% to 5% over list. There were only 18 of 173 (10%) that sold for a double-digit percentage over list. The big winners:

Most % Over List Price

List Price
Sales Price
Percentage Over List Price
$969,000
$1,210,000
25%
$1,399,000
$1,700,000
22%
$1,099,000
$1,316,000
20%
$1,425,000
$1,675,000
18%
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
17%
$1,499,000
$1,750,000
17%
$999,000
$1,160,000
16%

NSDCC Sales, April (First Half): 173

(the number of sales was 45% higher than same period in 2019)

Average List Price: $2,349,402

Average Sales Price: $2,352,561 (100%)

Median List Price: $1,700,000

Median Sales Price: $1,750,000 (103%)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Over List By Price Range:

Under $1.0M: 12

$1.0M – $1.5M: 34

$1.5M – $2.0M: 36

$2.0M – $3.0M: 12

Over $3.0M: 5

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Inventory Watch

Last week I mentioned that because there was a drop-off in pendings, we might have hit peak frenzy. But I didn’t consider the usual spring break lull – we’re right back at it now:

Two Weeks Ago:

Actives: 334

Pendings: 362

Last week:

Actives: 357

Pendings: 344

This Week:

Actives: 335

Pendings: 358

The action under $2,000,000 is phenomenal – look at the NSDCC active-to-pending ratios:

Price Range
# NSDCC Active Listings
# NSDCC Pending Listings
$0-$1M
5
15
$1.0M – $1.5M
30
83
$1.5 – $2.0M
27
99
$2.0M – $3.0M
54
70
$3.0M+
223
98

The $1.0M to $2.0M range is red hot!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(more…)

Beachfront

For those of us who didn’t make to the beach today, this will have to do – from 2011:

This townhouse sold for $2,400,000 in 2006, for $1,450,000 in 2012, and $3,200,000 in 2016. Bobby had sold it in 2000 for $1,050,000.

Zillow vs The Rest

This week we heard the the news that homes.com was acquired:

Homes.com has a similar business model to massive real estate website Zillow, at least as far as Zillow’s core business goes. Homes.com is a property listing portal that helps agents and brokers market properties. The platform supports more than a half-million agents and brokers, and the website receives about 5 million unique visitors each month in the form of buyers searching listings.

For the time being, Homes.com is a much smaller business. Zillow’s real estate platform received more than 200 million unique monthly users in the fourth quarter of 2020 and was visited 2.2 billion times altogether. And Zillow has a rapidly growing business of directly buying and selling homes, while Homes.com is solely a home search platform. What’s more, keep in mind that CoStar is buying Homes.com for $156 million — Zillow’s market cap is about $34 billion.

However, it’s not just Homes.com anymore. Once it’s brought under CoStar’s umbrella, it will join forces with brands like the LoopNet commercial real estate marketplace (an area where Zillow doesn’t operate), Apartments.com, Apartment Finder, and most importantly, the Homesnap real estate agent workflow software business.

Homesnap is another recent acquisition, purchased by CoStar in December 2020. The Homesnap platform offers a marketing platform for agents, and CoStar plans to take advantage of the combination with Homes.com. As CEO Andrew Florance said in the press release announcing the acquisition, “Our plan in bringing Homesnap and Homes.com together is to help agents market their listings in support of the ‘your listing, your lead’ philosophy — which stands in contrast to most players in the industry.”

Can any home-search portal keep up with Zillow?  They would need to spend the big bucks on advertising like Zillow does, just to be in the running.  Zillow already has the name-brand recognition, a huge lead in monthly visitors, and they have the killer instinct and willingness to spend big on advertising – including key product placement. Displaying their for-sale signs in their ads will further establish them as a national brokerage in the mind of the consumer:

Active Listings & Sales History


It is unusual to have so few active listings for sale.  Yet, we are having more sales than ever, with the quality homes all selling in the first week – leaving very few active listings.

Casual observers don’t find any decent homes just lying around, making it difficult to stay engaged.  You gotta really want to buy a house these days, which should help keep the demand in check – it’s just for serious players only.

But there are plenty of those, and we should hit October levels of sales in each of the next few months:

Upzoning Carlsbad

Above is the map produced by the City of Carlsbad to help identify the areas where they can increase production of multi-family units, and try to reach their low-income housing goals.

I circled in red the larger developments:

  • The owners of the Mall have proposed rezoning their parking lots and adding 993 homes there, plus the neighboring Verizon/Michael’s shopping center has proposed redeveloping it into 242 residential units – a total of 1,235 homes.
  • The #4 site in the middle was once going to be a WalMart (who owns it), but it never gained traction.  A developer from Phoenix has proposed building 474 homes on the 39 acres there.
  • There are six parcels totaling 21 acres on both sides of Poinsettia at Brigantine.  Under the current zoning, 50 homes could be built there, but the developer as applied for upzoning so they can build 327 multi-family units.

If re-zoned, these projects will include NO single-family houses. Because the city is pressed to hit their goals, it looks like most of these units will be restricted to low-to-moderate income residents.

Read the full report here:

Link to City of Carlsbad report

Pin It on Pinterest