Over List, June

The percentage of buyers who were willing to pay over list reached another all-time high in June:

NSDCC Detached-Home Sales, % Closed Over List Price

January: 38%

February: 43%

March: 53%

April: 55%

May: 54%

June: 59%

There were 37% of the total sales that closed for $100,000+ over list price!

The action was really hot in the $2,000,000s – the other price ranges cooled off slightly:

Percentage Who Paid Over List Price by Price Range

Price Range
March
April
May
June
$0 – $1.0M
76%
79%
89%
88%
$1.0M – $1.5M
68%
78%
84%
75%
$1.5M – $2.0M
66%
66%
72%
66%
$2.0M – $3.0M
54%
32%
34%
66%
$3M+
16%
22%
22%
17%

After rising in six-figure amounts the previous month, it looks like pricing might be leveling off too:

NSDCC Average and Median Prices

Month
# of Sales
Avg. LP
Avg. SP
Median LP
Median SP
Feb
224
$2,298,797
$2,257,334
$1,719,500
$1,758,000
March
252
$2,295,629
$2,260,524
$1,800,000
$1,825,000
April
357
$2,396,667
$2,403,962
$1,799,900
$1,828,000
May
300
$2,596,992
$2,581,715
$1,900,000
$1,994,500
June
348
$2,509,175
$2,537,953
$1,900,000
$1,967,500

We’ve been experiencing the hottest real estate market in the history of the world!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Inventory Watch

We can handle a few more homes on the market, it would be a surge of new listings that we fear.

But there is no surge.

As long as there are more pendings than actives, the market is doing just fine.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(more…)

Happy 4th of July

Of the 1,682 NSDCC houses sold this year, the median list price was $1,800,000, the median sales price was $1,850,050, and the median days on market was 12.

An excerpt from the UT article linked below – the lack of homes for sale is stunning:

If you look at the overall number of homes for sale in San Diego County, it is still at historic lows. There were 3,990 homes for sale from May 24 to June 20. That is below even 2020 with stay-at-home orders in place when there were around 6,260 at the same time. The same goes for 2019 with 8,561 homes listed; 2018 with 8,064 and 7,185 in 2017.

So, while there have been more new listings in recent weeks, they have been selling so fast that inventory totals don’t have the chance to grow. For instance, around this time last year, about half of homes were selling in two weeks or less (compared with more than 70 percent now). That meant a home that went on the market in May might still be there in June or July — whereas now there is no buildup in supply because new listings are snatched up so rapidly.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/story/2021-07-02/there-are-more-homes-for-sale-in-san-diego-in-recent-weeks-heres-why-its-hard-to-notice

NSDCC Monthly Listings & Sales

The Covid Frenzy has had remarkable shift in market efficiency like we have never seen.

Historically, we have had so many listings that 35% to 40% of them didn’t sell.

This year we had 977 listings hit the market in 1Q21, and 80% of them have already closed escrow!  Of the remaining listings that haven’t sold, two-thirds of them were cancelled, withdrawn, or expired which usually means that the sellers either changed their mind or refreshed their listings.  Of the 977 listings, only 47 of them remain as active (unsold) listings, with a median list price of $6,900,000!

Yet, the extremely active marketplace isn’t causing more people to sell.

The total number of 2021 listings is 8% behind the covid-impacted 2020!

NSDCC Listings and Sales

Month
2018
2019
2020
2021
2021 L/S
Jan
426/149
418/150
353/182
285/187
1.52
Feb
358/162
361/174
360/184
311/224
1.39
Mar
446/258
498/211
368/206
381/252
1.51
Apr
469/270
494/265
288/156
382/357
1.07
May
522/273
502/297
484/143
404/301
1.34
Jun
476/299
435/282
448/274
357/340
1.05
1H Totals
2,697/1,411
2,708/1,379
2,301/1,145
2,120/1,661
List/Sales
1.91
1.96
2.01
1.28

There were 357 new listings last month, and 340 sales?!?!  The lack of inventory or the rapidly-rising prices aren’t slowing down sales!  If only there were more houses to sell under $2,000,000!

If sales were to retreat, it would seem obvious that it would be due to the lack of supply.  There have been more losers of bidding wars than winners, and that demand has yet to be satisfied.

But we are going to hear more doomer talk in the media. Here we have Larry predicting that more homes will be listed in the latter half of 2021 – which would cause MORE sales – yet check the headline:

An excerpt:

What happened: All regions saw an uptick in pending sales, led by a 15.5% surge in the Northeast. The South saw the smallest increase, with a 4.9% uptick.

The big picture: The uptick in pending sales could be sustained, Yun argued, because of the strong stock market and rising home prices. He predicted that more homes will be listed in the latter half of the year, which would help to slow the pace of home-price growth.

Still, economists generally anticipate that the second half of 2021 will see a slowdown in real-estate transactions. To get an idea of where home sales are headed, look no further than the data for mortgage applications.

“Sales lag mortgage applications, and the 26% plunge in the latter between December and April is now working its way through the sales numbers,” Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, wrote in a research note. He went on to argue that “sales will soon hit bottom, given the flattening in mortgage demand over the past couple months.”

The latest mortgage-applications data from the Mortgage Bankers Association would back up that prediction. The trade group’s index that measures the volume of applications for loans used to purchase homes was down 17% from a year ago as of the week ending June 25, and had declined 6% from the previous week.

Hit bottom? Bottom of what?

The ‘26% plunge’ in mortgage applications between December and April didn’t slow sales – they are higher in every market.  But determined to find some doom, he surmises that the lower number of purchase applications will catch up to sales some day?

It doesn’t occur to the ivory-tower types that the market was going ballistic last summer, and this week’s mortgage apps being 17% lower than last year is not alarming.  We had 350 NSDCC sales last August, and another 361 sales in September – both record highs!

Yet the media publishes this garbage without a thought.  They could unwittingly cause a slowdown just when more homes might be coming to market – which would goose sales higher, not lower.

Is It Housing Demand, or Supply?

There is a collective mindset.

For the last year, real estate has been hot around the world.  When California gets cooking, so do all the neighboring states. And when America gets cooking, other markets around the world benefit too.

There are varying degrees of hot, but we can say that real estate markets everywhere have been operating at their peak capacity.

We’ve had a year of full-tilt frenzy and sales were SPECTACULAR!

But yesterday we got the first headline from Doomer Diana that should be a marker:

Thankfully, not many people will read her article where she states that higher prices and rates are the cause of the ‘fizzle’, which is a knee-jerk reaction. She and others will blame the buyers for any slowdown.

Good thing she didn’t see the the graph at the top that has showings lower than in June, 2019, and you remember how that ended (the San Diego Case-Shiller flat-lined for the second half of 2019).

It will be common to blame the buyers.  But for the first time ever, our real estate market is having a critical shortage of homes for sale when the demand is exceedingly high.  There were 500 people who visited a $1,700,000 Carmel Valley house over the weekend.  Demand is not our problem, it is the lack of supply.

I’ll back it up with some stats shortly.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Loan Mods, Not Foreclosures

Rather than foreclose, they will keep changing the rules. They are creating a ‘Custom’ pool of mortgages to modify the loans again – even if it means extending them for 40 years!

Ginnie Mae sent out a press release last week could create some confusion for those readers who only skimmed the lede. The opening paragraph states that the agency is creating a new pool of mortgages for securitization on the secondary market. The pool, to be known as Pool Type C-ET, will contain loans with terms up to 40 years while the current set of pool types only supports loans with 30 year or shorter terms. It is easy to miss that this special pool is not a new offering for borrowers but is limited to loans that have gone through a loan modification.

It is probable that this pool is being created in anticipation of the number of FHA, VA, and USDA loans that will be coming out of pandemic-related forbearance plans. The latest survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association estimated that 5.13 percent of homeowners with those loans were still in the program as of June 20. Black Knight’s weekly survey estimates the raw number at over 800,000. Many of these borrowers have either entered or will soon enter he last three months of eligibility which is currently capped at 18 months, and most will have significant past due balances.

Borrowers who leave the program are offered several options for paying back their arrearages including several types of loan modifications. Among them is a re-amortization of the loan to spread the amount over the remaining life of the loan, but in many cases this could result in an unaffordable monthly payment.

The new pool type is expected to be available by October, at about the time the 18 month terms begin to expire. It will be a “Custom” pool with a minimum size of one loan and a $25,000 minimum balance. There will be no upper limit on the loan amount as long as the eligible collateral meets the participating agency’s requirements. That collateral will be participating agency modified loans with original terms of 361 months or more, capped at 480 months. All modifications of an included mortgage loan after its origination must have been occasioned by default or reasonably foreseeable default.

“It’s important that Ginnie Mae issuers have secondary market liquidity for options that our agency partners determine are appropriate for supporting homeowners in distress,” said Michael Drayne, Ginnie Mae’s Acting Executive Vice President. “Because an extended term up to 40 years can be a powerful tool in reducing monthly payment obligations with the goal of home retention, we have begun work to make this security product available.”

Drayne noted that the terms and extent of use of the included loans would ultimately be determined by the FHA, HUD’s Office of Public and Indian Housing, VA, and USDA’ Rural Development Program. Their loans are the basis for the Ginnie Mae pools.

“Ginnie Mae has been integral to the interagency actions to prevent foreclosure for homeowners experiencing financial hardship as a result of COVID-19,” said Alanna McCargo, HUD Senior Advisor to Secretary Marcia Fudge. “The challenges of the last year require meaningful solutions to help keep people in their homes, which has been a priority for Secretary Fudge. As interest rates rise, this 40-year feature will enable more payment reduction options to help homeowners.”

http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/06292021_ginnie_mae_loans.asp

Pin It on Pinterest