Leap Frogs

Have you ever jumped into Petco Park? This is how it looks.

The Navy Parachute Team not only got to jump into the Padres’ 2014 home opener, but were able to participate in honoring baseball legend Jerry Coleman by flying a special flag with his initials and trademark star:

Inventory Watch – More Steady

The sales count for March should be well below the 299 NSDCC detached-home sales closed in 2013 – we’re only at 203 this month, with one day to go plus the late-reporters. We closed 25 sales on the last day of March, 2013. The average SP/sf is up 29% Y-O-Y!

North SD County’s Coastal Region (La Jolla-to-Carlsbad)

The UNDER-$800,000 Market:

Date
NSDCC Active Listings
Avg. LP/sf
DOM
Avg SF
November 25
95
$376/sf
47
1,988sf
December 2
79
$371/sf
50
2,047sf
December 9
72
$383/sf
43
1,954sf
December 16
81
$378/sf
42
1,948sf
December 23
77
$374/sf
49
1,937sf
December 30
76
$373/sf
51
1,950sf
January 6
74
$370/sf
49
1,995sf
January 13
71
$381/sf
44
1,921sf
January 20
72
$384/sf
41
1,877sf
January 27
75
$399/sf
40
1,891sf
February 3
78
$409/sf
41
1,876sf
February 10
82
$395/sf
38
1,927sf
February 17
85
$387/sf
35
1,929sf
February 24
90
$383/sf
37
2,008sf
March 3
82
$397/sf
39
1,942sf
March 10
88
$377/sf
37
2,008sf
March 17
89
$366/sf
34
2,038sf
March 24
79
$369/sf
34
2,031sf
March 31
78
$367/sf
39
2,069sf

The $800,000 – $1,400,000 Market:

Date
NSDCC Active Listings
Avg. LP/sf
DOM
Avg SF
November 25
245
$448/sf
61
2,856sf
December 2
239
$448/sf
64
2,851sf
December 9
226
$461/sf
65
2,812sf
December 16
211
$464/sf
66
2,794sf
December 23
197
$453/sf
73
2,813sf
December 30
173
$450/sf
78
2,821sf
January 6
170
$470/sf
65
2,757sf
January 13
168
$463/sf
59
2,764sf
January 20
174
$444/sf
51
2,882sf
January 27
166
$435/sf
52
2,902sf
February 3
165
$441/sf
53
2,857sf
February 10
175
$443/sf
51
2,852sf
February 17
180
$447/sf
50
2,803sf
February 24
188
$438/sf
44
2,846sf
March 3
202
$421/sf
44
2,936sf
March 10
215
$431/sf
41
2,854sf
March 17
223
$421/sf
42
2,918sf
March 24
217
$419/sf
42
2,941sf
March 31
223
$425/sf
44
2,887sf

(more…)

Lower Rates Offset Prices

I hope more media types use actual real-life examples, but while we are talking about how they like to apply their opinions to vague, general data, let’s consider the other side of the coin.

Want evidence to explain the red-hot market conditions?

Look at mortgage rates, and how they’ve offset the rise in prices:

Year
SD Median SP
80% Loan Amt
Int. Rate
Mo. Payment
1990
$183,210
$146,568
10.13%
$1,300
2000
$269,400
$215,520
8.05%
$1,589
2010
$385,740
$308,592
4.69%
$1,599
2014
$450,000
$360,000
4.30%
$1,782

The cumulative CPI inflation since 1990 was 79.6%.

Add the 79.6% to the 1990 payment of $1,300, and today’s inflation-adjusted payment would be $2,335 – and we are 24% UNDER that now.

Bernanke is going to be called a hero.

Want more? The population of San Diego County has risen 29% since 1990 too – and apparently a lot of the newcomers were affluent!

Sales As The Leading Indicator

Livinincali left this comment Thursday:

If history is any guide you’d expect sales volume to start dropping before seeing any movement down on price. The sales volume numbers back in winter of late 2012, 2013 were seasonally higher than they have been and that marked the beginning of the price appreciation.  Now it seems as the sales volume have fallen off a bit and price appreciation has moderated.  If sales volume continues to be soft expect appreciation to be minimal this year.  It seems like some segments of the market are still hot but it doesn’t feel like the frenzy of last year around this time where everything in the county was hot.

Historically, sales are the leading indicator, and prices have always followed.

Many are very committed to the fundamentals, and that in itself could help propel the actual market activity – a self-fulfilling prophecy.  A loan rep in the OC named Logan has sparred with me about it on Twitter, and he has included the Trulia economist in the conversation – which is fine by me because they share the same view that history will repeat itself, regardless.

twitterwar

Logan is entitled to one man’s opinion.  But Trulia stories get published everywhere now, and could carry considerable influence with home buyers.  They are a mainstream-media source for market data, and have a responsibility to dig for the truth.

The Twitter war above got started over this article, which is now being published by media outlets everywhere:

http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/la-fi-home-prices-20140326,0,4729002.story#axzz2xIS4jHJV

Suggesting that bubbles are forming in areas where prices rising faster than those incomes is shallow and incomplete.  Let’s consider additional facts.

Do reports of fewer sales have to be contributed to stagnant incomes, un-affordability, employment, economics, DTI, etc., that will drive prices down, or are there other explanations?

1.  It was predicted here six months ago that people would be comparing 2014 sales to the ultra-hot frenzy months of 2013, and claim the sky is falling.  You could say that the low rates of 2013 alone were driving people to buy; now that higher-and-steady rates aren’t driving the market, sales look pretty similar to recent years – IN SPITE OF HIGHER PRICES.

Detached-Home Sales Between Jan. 1 – March 15:

Year
NSDCC Sales
Avg $/sf
SD Co. Sales
Avg $/sf
2010
360
$377/sf
3,428
$237/sf
2011
412
$376/sf
3,476
$234/sf
2012
450
$367/sf
3,987
$226/sf
2013
518
$389/sf
4,423
$255/sf
2014
459
$500/sf
3,518
$312/sf

Take out the 2013 frenzy-driven era, and sales look similar, or better, than previous years, even though pricing is substantially higher.

2. A preliminary sign of a market top would be more homes not selling, and inventory rising. If inventory was rising steadily, AND sales were flat or declining, then a call for lower prices would be obvious.  But the inventory is about the same as last year:

SD inventory

A big difference that is critical to the equation is that 2013 sellers were caught off-guard at rapid rebound in pricing.  But the word is out now, and the 2014 sellers are VERY WELL AWARE of the improved market/higher pricing.  Yet sales are strong.

3.  This year’s sellers are more elective.  They didn’t have to sell last year, and waited until they could get even more money this year – and they are only selling if they get their price.  Yet sales are strong.

4.  Every seller wants more, not less.  It is the sellers’ creed – tack on a little extra to what the last guy got.  Yet sales are strong.

5.  If prices did falter, sellers just wouldn’t sell.  The ego of a seller is powerful, and selling for any less than ‘their price’ is ‘giving it away’.  Sellers will avoid that at all costs, and just cancel their listing instead.  You’ll know that pricing is heading downward when you see inventory dry up further.  Yet sales are strong.

6.  There is absolutely NO threat of distressed sales undermining the market.  Of the 1,180 NSDCC listings this year, 12 have been short-sales, and one has been an REO.  Yet sales are strong – stronger than when buyers could have gotten a deal.

7.  Multiple offers are everywhere. I can only speak about the north-coastal region of San Diego County, but everywhere I go, there are multiple offers – even on houses that aren’t that great.  You will see bidding wars dry up before sales start to drop.  Yet sales are strong.

8.  We have never seen the inventory sustain at levels this low.  There is an awareness and appreciation about one’s home that is superseding price – people aren’t interested in moving, no matter what they could get for it. The Z-man said yesterday that the low inventory is due to 20% of the country being underwater.  Did he interview each one of those people?  They could have short-sold anytime over the last few years if they wanted to move – but they didn’t.

In summary, buyers are ready, willing, and able to buy homes today – at these prices, and these mortgage rates.  There would be as many – if not more – sales this year, than in 2013, if there were just more decent homes to sell at today’s prices.

Homes that aren’t selling today are the ones priced outrageously – anything close to the right price is selling. Hopefully it means there is a price ceiling – and we have arrived at the unaffordable plateau for now.

Sellers are insisting that we stay at these prices, or higher – they aren’t backing down. For now, buyers are agreeing.  I haven’t seen any house sell for less than the comps this year – have you?

Until the bidding wars dry up, and then sales start to falter when compared to non-frenzy months, then prices should hang around these levels.

Shaking Up Real Estate?

house selling - changesEvery year we hear how the industry is going to change, and specifically, how the internet will cause the sellers of real estate to change their ways.

Zillow and Trulia sell advertising to realtors.  They will be in full support of the status quo, as seen below in the video.  They want the full-commission model to stick around so agents have more money for advertising!

The R-team brokerage is a solo operator who relies on their whiz-bang website to generate customers.  But that makes them potential enemies with Z&T.  Glenn takes a shot at both in this piece, while doing his usual touting his company:

http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140326183218-5434591-the-state-of-my-industry-why-real-estate-is-taking-so-long-to-change

But his company’s formula has a weakness.  The agents showing the houses are just part-time door-openers, while the agent who writes the offer is back at the office  – they have never seen the house.

They are hoping that reduced commissions and fancy tech talk will overcome this structural flaw.  But without expert advice in the field, buyers will hedge a little on price, and as long as there are multiple offers, they will struggle to compete.  Plus, in a bidding war, will a listing agent select an offer from the red team in a close race?  I have done so, but I’ve also heard grumblings from other agents about doing the opposite.

Then you have Harcourts, who announced this week that they are bringing their auction expert from Australia to show America how to do it.  If they and auction.com could get some traction, maybe the industry will head that way.  But the reserve prices and auctioneers bidding against buyers will be a turnoff.

Zillow seems to be leading the way, so status quo will probably win out.

What do you think?

Key Replacement

key-meI haven’t tested this mobile app yet, but it looks interesting.

By taking and keeping a photo of your key, if you get locked out of your house you can alert the service and a key will be delivered to you within 60 minutes.

Plus, you can order copies of your key too, and they will be mailed – or visit one of their kiosks to have a key made from your photo.

Check this out:

https://www.key.me/

Know of any other handy household-related mobile apps?

Booming Markets

qualcomm-logoFrom our friends at John Burns Real Estate Consulting – HT to Stormin!  Although John included San Diego as one of the towns that could be impacted by FHA loan limits being reduced, we’re probably more of a booming-market hybrid. Our drivers include Qualcomm and biotech, foreign investment, and low inventory.  

Read the full article here:

http://www.realestateconsulting.com/blog/john-burns/housing-booming-busting-and-muddling-along

A brief excerpt:

Booming Markets

I find three primary reasons that certain housing markets are booming:

1.
Tech boom. Prices are rising rapidly in the best locations in the Bay Area and Seattle. I believe the best Bay Area locations, which extend all the way to the East Bay, are now officially overpriced because the wave of tech millionaires will not continue forever. Our Northern California leader Dean Wehrli recently calculated that one city in the Bay Area  is usually 20% more expensive than a more outlying city is now 50% more expensive!
2.
Pro-growth environment and oil boom. Texas’s pro-growth attitude, which is best exemplified by their governor who has been flying all over the country to recruit companies to Texas, has succeeded in adding 700 new jobs per day for the last two years, and those new employees are buying homes, particularly in Houston. Our Dallas consulting leader Paige Shipp notes that the oil industry boom helps, but health care, financial services, transportation, and other sectors have also contributed to the growth.
3.
45+ buyer markets. The oldest Baby Boomer turns 68 this year, and the youngest turns 50. They are buying homes in droves as their employment situation, home values, and stock portfolios have almost fully recovered from the Great Recession. Our Florida leader Lesley Deutch was recently in Naples, where prices are rising rapidly thanks to strong sales. We are seeing strong sales in this same demographic throughout the country, however.

Pre-Listing Websites

pre-MLS saleFrank has a local SD page in his Facebook network, but it has been among the slower to attract new members.

He allowed me to join, but then wondered if I was the enemy.  I just want to see if it gains any traction – but so far, not much.  There are 254 realtors in the group, but only five properties have been imputed since November.

But if NAR continues to implode, and agents get more desperate, the whole basis of the multiple-listing system – sharing listings among agents – could die.

There are many market forces pushing towards single agency, and there may be more than one solution.  In the meantime, we will see many alternatives:

From the wapo:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/where-we-live/wp/2014/03/24/in-tight-market-pre-listing-sites-becoming-popular/

Excerpts:

Some agents believe that as members of MRIS they are required to list properties on the service. The issue has spurred heated discussions at local brokers offices in the region.

“We call them the old boy or old girls networks, where the small group of people that belong get the first opportunity,” said Tony Duncanson, chairman of the D.C. Real Estate Commission. “When we get into tight markets, like in the last two to three years, you start hearing about these type of networks more and more,” Duncanson said.

The close-knit networks Duncanson was referring to include brokers that only market properties to agents affiliated within the same brokerage firm. Some refer to this as a pocket listing.

“The main concern in these situations is that those properties were not given the maximum exposure to the marketplace, particularly in the good market that we have now where the seller may be able to get a better price,” Duncanson said.

“There may also be a fair housing issue,” Duncanson added. “It doesn’t seem to be fair because many people are totally excluded. There are those in the fair housing arena that consider it discriminatory because the listing is not marketed to every licensed agent.”

LLosa said he opposes pocket listings. “How is that best for the seller?” LLosa said. “I am against brokers trying to snag both sides of the deal at their clients’ expense.”

Roger Carp, managing broker of the Long & Foster office in Georgetown, agreed. “Who does it benefit not to put the house on the MLS?” he asked. “ It doesn’t benefit a seller. The MLS was created to give homes the maximum exposure possible. Anyone that is buying real estate searches the MLS. With all these different types of exclusive clubs, many Realtors are not hearing about properties that could be beneficial for their clients. In the end, the seller could be missing out.”

Some agents believe that as members of MRIS they are required to list properties on the service. The issue has spurred heated discussions at local brokers offices in the region.

“If there is permission from the consumer, then the agent does not have to list the property on MRIS,” Strauch of MRIS said.

Pin It on Pinterest