Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
More Links

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home? Contact Jim the Realtor!

Carlsbad
(760) 434-5000

Carmel Valley
(858) 560-7700
jim@jimklinge.com


Category Archive: ‘Local Government’

Immigration Reform Benefits Housing

Excerpts from this article in bloomberg.com:

welcome allEfforts to revamp U.S. immigration laws may bring at least one unintended benefit for the economy: The nascent housing recovery will probably get an added boost.

The number of foreign-born homeowners will increase by 2.8 million in the decade ending 2020, compared with a 2.4 million gain in the previous 10 years, according to a Mortgage Bankers Association study that didn’t assess the potential impact of any new legislation.

Research by a group of Hispanic real-estate agents concludes the increase could be even bigger if undocumented workers were put on a path to citizenship.

Passage of an immigration bill may generate about 3 million more homebuyers over the next several years, according to a report last week from the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals in San Diego.

Yadira Ortiz of San Marcos, California, is a case in point. The 24-year-old lab technician arrived from Mexico in 1993. She and her husband bought their first house in December, a $308,000 three-bedroom, two-bath property.

Ortiz, who has two daughters, said she was inspired by her parents and considers her home an investment to “help our children in the long term.”

“I appreciate that my parents decided to come here and give us a better future,” Ortiz said. “They have worked hard and they don’t get paid that much but they have their own home, they can afford their home. I saw how hard they were working and I decided to do the same thing.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-02/immigrant-dreams-to-keep-sparking-u-s-housing-recovery.html

Posted by on Apr 19, 2013 in Local Flavor, Local Government, Market Conditions | 3 comments

Moonlight Condo Towers?

From the Coast News:

Encinitas has until Aug. 30 to show where 1,300 state-mandated housing units could be built as part of its housing element. If the city wants to meet the housing element deadline, Encinitas will have to make significant progress.

A St EncinitasCities could potentially face lawsuits for not adopting a housing element by the end of August. However, Encinitas hasn’t certified a housing element since incorporation in 1986, and yet the city hasn’t been significantly penalized. Still, representatives from the city said it’s important to have a housing element in place to take the threat of lawsuits off the table, make Encinitas eligible for more grants and finish a long-contentious process.

“I’m not sure what will happen, but if we were going to get it done by August, there’s still much work to be done,” Mayor Teresa Barth said.

She added that the city wants to at least demonstrate “forward motion” by August, and that councilmembers and residents have been notably frustrated by the housing element over the years.

The department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requires that cities turn in a housing element every eight years. For the housing element, cities have to pencil out the potential locations of state-imposed housing. The number of housing units, 1,300 in the case of Encinitas, is derived from population and economic trends.

As for the 1,300 units that have already been allocated to Encinitas, Michael Strong, associate planner with the city, said that Encinitas and other California cities have “no vested right” to change or overturn the housing that’s been assigned to them.

He pointed to a legal case as precedent: About five years ago, the city of Irvine tried to fight the number of state-mandated housing units demanded of the city with a lawsuit. Ultimately, Irvine lost the two-year legal battle.

Conceivably, developers and affordable housing advocates could sue Encinitas for not having a certified housing element. Strong noted that other cities in California have lost court cases for not having one.

Yet another factor could affect the city’s housing element. On June 18, residents will decide whether to approve the “right-to-vote” initiative. If it passes, increasing density or building heights beyond 30 feet would require a majority vote of the public.

Presentations from groups looking at the housing element recommended selectively putting four or five story buildings in certain locations to accommodate some of the 1,300 units. This would trigger a vote if the initiative becomes law.

For more on the outrageous Encinitas City Council:

http://encinitasundercover.blogspot.com/

Posted by on Mar 22, 2013 in Local Government | 0 comments

“Public Guarantor”

An excerpt from the latest housing commission report on how the government should participate in the mortgage industry:

While private capital must play a greater role in the housing finance system, continued government involvement is essential to ensuring that mortgages remain available and affordable to qualified homebuyers.

The commission recommends the establishment of a limited, catastrophic government guarantee to ensure timely payment of principal and interest on qualified mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

This guarantee should (1) be explicit and fully paid for through premium collections that exceed expected claims (with a safe reserve cushion); (2) be triggered only after private capital in the predominant loss position has been fully exhausted; and (3) apply only to the securities and not to the equity or debt of the entities that issue or insure them.

The commission proposes to replace the GSEs with an independent, wholly owned government corporation—the “Public Guarantor”—that would provide a limited catastrophic government guarantee for both the single-family and rental markets.

Unlike the GSEs, the Public Guarantor would not buy or sell mortgages or issue MBS. It would simply guarantee investors the timely payment of principal and interest on these securities.

The model endorsed by the commission is similar to Ginnie Mae, the government agency that wraps securities backed by federally insured or guaranteed loans.

Other than the Public Guarantor, all other actors in this new system—originators, issuers of securities, credit enhancers, and mortgage servicers—should be private-sector entities fully at risk for their own finances and not covered by either implicit or explicit government guarantees benefitting their investors or creditors.

In the new system, the limited catastrophic guarantee of the Public Guarantor would only be triggered after all private capital ahead of it has been exhausted.

The government would be in the fourth-loss position behind (1) borrowers and their home equity; (2) private credit enhancers; and (3) the corporate resources of the issuers and servicers.

Read the full report here:

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/housing-future

Posted by on Mar 1, 2013 in Local Government, Mortgage News | 5 comments

Disclosing Foreclosure to Tenants

As of Jan. 1, property managers and landlords in California are required to disclose in writing to any prospective tenants if a notice of default has been recorded against the property. The law applies to rentals of single-family homes and apartment buildings of no more than four units.

The disclosure also includes a notice that if a new owner takes ownership of a property following foreclosure, the owner will not be able to evict the tenants for at least 90 days written eviction notices in many cases.

Supporters of the new bill say that that such a disclosure is critical for tenants in making an informed decision about where to live. Opponents, however, argued that such disclosures could worsen the financial conditions of the landlord and even hasten foreclosure.

For landlords who violate the disclosure requirement, tenants may be able to void any lease and recover one month’s rent or twice the actual damages — whichever is greater. Tenants may also be able to recover all prepaid rent from the landlord if the landlord violates the disclosure requirement, according to the new law.

http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2013/01/03/new-calif-law-requires-disclosure-foreclosure-tenants

Posted by on Jan 5, 2013 in Local Government, Real Estate Investing | 3 comments

Record Number of Tax Bills

County Treasurer-Tax Collector Dan McAllister has mailed the 2012-2013 Secured Property Tax Bill. This year, 980,654 San Diego County Property Taxpayers can expect to receive their new bill. This represents an all time record high number in tax bills being mailed to taxpayers.

The year’s secured property tax billing is expected to generate $4,571,199,196 from the collection of these bills. This is an increase of $30 million over last year.

“Our numbers in San Diego County continue to rise,” stated McAllister. “More tax bills, more revenue and the collection rate from our taxpayers are at an all-time high at 98%. Our taxpayers know the importance of paying on time and avoiding hefty late fees. I’m proud to represent our taxpayers and look forward to a productive tax collection year.”

McAllister also announced that with the addition of American Express, his office now accepts all major credit cards (American Express, MasterCard, Visa and Discover) when paying online and by phone. He reminded taxpayers that cash will not be accepted at any of the branch offices, only in the main office located in downtown San Diego. He reinforced, “Save Time, Pay Online.” Due to the Waterfront Park construction at the County Administration Center in downtown San Diego, the south parking lot is currently closed. An echeck payment through the tax collector’s website currently has no convenience fee charge.

Posted by on Oct 20, 2012 in Local Government | 0 comments

More on California Exodus

‘California is God’s best moment,” says Joel Kotkin. “It’s the best place in the world to live.”

Or at least it used to be.

Mr. Kotkin, one of the nation’s premier demographers, left his native New York City in 1971 to enroll at the University of California, Berkeley. The state was a far-out paradise for hipsters who had grown up listening to the Mamas & the Papas’ iconic “California Dreamin’” and the Beach Boys’ “California Girls.” But it also attracted young, ambitious people “who had a lot of dreams, wanted to build big companies.” Think Intel, Apple and HP.

Now, however, the Golden State’s fastest-growing entity is government and its biggest product is red tape. The first thing that comes to many American minds when you mention California isn’t Hollywood or tanned girls on a beach, but Greece. Many progressives in California take that as a compliment since Greeks are ostensibly happier. But as Mr. Kotkin notes, Californians are increasingly pursuing happiness elsewhere.

Nearly four million more people have left the Golden State in the last two decades than have come from other states. This is a sharp reversal from the 1980s, when 100,000 more Americans were settling in California each year than were leaving. According to Mr. Kotkin, most of those leaving are between the ages of 5 and 14 or 34 to 45. In other words, young families.

Read More

Posted by on Oct 7, 2012 in Local Government, Market Conditions | 0 comments

GOP Platform on Real Estate

From NMN:

The new platform of the Republican Party calls for downsizing the Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance program and winding down the “size and scope” of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s secondary market activities.

“The FHA, which tripled in size to more than $1 trillion under the current administration, has crowded out the private sector and is at risk of requiring a taxpayer bailout,” says the GOP platform statement released midweek in Tampa. “It must be downsized and limited to helping first-time homeowners and low- and moderate-income borrowers.”

But the GOP statement of principles offers no specifics on how Fannie and Freddie should be “wound down.”

America Enterprise Institute resident fellow Edward Pinto told National Mortgage News that House Republicans have approved a fiscal year 2013 budget that calls for placing a cap on GSE loan limits. (Pinto is at the convention.)

“Such a policy would reduce the number of loans the entities could back, naturally shrinking their market share,” the budget document says.

Pinto noted that it would take an act of Congress to reduce Fannie and Freddie’s loan limit.

He and two of his AEI colleagues have recommended a gradual reduction in the GSEs’ loan limits, currently capped at $625,500.

“Fannie and Freddie’s loan limits should be reduced over time. This will lead to them being phased out so that the private sector can take on more of the secondary market as the GSEs withdraw,” Pinto said. “That will lead to a solid robust housing market,” he added.

On the MID:

In a series of ads in Tampa this week, the National Association of Home Builders has been trying to send a message about the real estate industry’s clout to convention-goers.  “The road to the White House will be a driveway,” read one ad, which appeared in a special Tampa edition of The Hill. “Housing = Jobs.”

In big letters, the ad cited polling research that found that 68% of voters would be less likely to vote for a candidate who proposed eliminating the mortgage interest deduction.

While Romney has vowed to maintain the deduction, he reportedly has also told donors that he would limit its application on second homes, and he would also limit the deduction for state and local property taxes.

The Republican Party platform, released Tuesday, did not contain language that was included in the party’s 2008 platform about the value of preserving the mortgage interest deduction.  The decision to exclude that language reportedly came after former Sen. Jim Talent, a Romney adviser, argued that specific provisions on the tax code would get in the way of a budget deal.

Posted by on Aug 30, 2012 in Interest Rates/Loan Limits, Local Government | 4 comments

Candidates and Housing

From HW (If the candidates need help, see JtR answers in italics):

President Obama and GOP challenger Mitt Romney should start talking about their housing policy intentions, experts in the industry said.

A group of associations, nonprofits and think tanks made speeches and conducted a panel discussion in Washington, D.C., Wednesday to elevate the housing debate onto the national stage. They challenged political candidates to address the still ailing housing market as the presidential campaign shifts into high gear.

Both presidential candidates have been mostly silent on housing policy aside from Obama’s push to allow more homeowners to refinance and Romney’s comments early on the campaign trail to let the foreclosure process run its course.

Neither campaign, to date, has released substantive housing policy proposals.

“We are entering a critical phase of the presidential campaign,” said David Abromowitz, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. CAP and the National Council of La Raza, among others, sponsored the event.

In conjunction with the event, CAP released a set of seven housing questions it said it sent to each presidential candidate in a “Home for Good” campaign to bring more awareness to the still struggling housing market:

1. What will you do to prevent more unnecessary foreclosures and keep more families from losing their homes?

JtR: Foreclosures are only necessary if borrowers stop making their payments.

2. How will you address the problem of “underwater” mortgages?

JtR: What’s the problem? That people can’t move? We need to get used to having what we have.  “Stick and Stay and It Will Pay.”

3. How will you revitalize communities already hit hard by the foreclosure crisis?

JtR: Investors are willing to buy at make-sense prices. Once we hit that floor in hard-hit areas, owner-occupiers should be interested in buying at those prices too.  Keep FHA as the low-down alternative, and closely monitor their default reserves. 

4. How will you meet the pressing need for affordable rental housing?

JtR: Sell more homes to investors?  Encourage lease-options.

5. What will you do to assure that working and middle-class families can achieve homeownership in the future?

JtR: Keep FHA around, and promote lease-option plans to investors.  Encourage multi-generational families to live together.  Lobby NAR to do something productive.

6. What do you plan to do with the government-backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and what will take their place in the mortgage market of the future?

Don’t replace them, just quit subsidizing them.

7. How do you plan to protect households from predatory lending and discrimination in the U.S. mortgage market?

JtR: Make it a reality TV show where realtors and mortgage people are seen going to jail.

“We’ve caused extraordinary damage, my industry has,” said Mortgage Bankers Association President David Stevens, who spoke on a panel at the event. “The question is, How do we get hope back into the housing system?”

Stevens said he doesn’t want to create irrational exuberance over recent good news about home sales and house prices, but rather seeks balance in the housing market, including a balance between homeownership and renting.

“Clearly we had too many people promoted into homeownership and it disparaged and destroyed communities,” he said.

Homeownership needs to shift toward well-qualified borrowers with fully documented loans who can prove their ability to repay while balance on the renter side requires addressing a shortage of affordable rentals in key urban markets, Stevens said.

Posted by on Aug 16, 2012 in Ideas/Solutions, Local Government | 14 comments

Exotic Financing for Schools

An excerpt from the Will Carless article at the Voice of San Diego – hat tip to several readers!

The Poway Unified School District may be California’s poster child for exotic school bond financing, but it is by no means alone in San Diego County.

As I detailed in my story yesterday, Poway Unified borrowed $105 million last year using a form of financing called a capital appreciation bond. The district won’t start making payments on the loan until 2033, and by the time it’s paid off in 2051, taxpayers will have paid back almost $1 billion, or almost 10 times the original loan.

As I point out in my story, capital appreciation bonds have become increasingly popular across the state, since they allow school districts to borrow money now without raising taxes on current residents. Instead, the burden for paying for the bonds is pushed to future generations, who are left on the hook for loans that are wildly more expensive than conventional bonds.

I’ve been digging through public records to try and find some other examples of these bonds in San Diego County. I haven’t come across anything quite as extreme as Poway’s deal, but I have found some bonds with very similar rates of interest and repayment schedules.

The deals elsewhere in the county mirror Poway’s deal in other ways, too. All three districts had recently passed bond measures to complete previous renovation and modernization efforts that were behind because of cost overruns and delays.

The three bond measures, passed in 2008, all made the same promise to voters: Tax rates would stay the same.

Read more here:

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_3f780860-e0b7-11e1-821b-001a4bcf887a.html

I think this should be considered when making a decision about homebuying!

Posted by on Aug 7, 2012 in Local Government, Prop 13, Thinking of Buying?, Thinking of Selling?, Train Wrecks | 23 comments

Congresspeople Underwater

From the latimes.com:

SACRAMENTO — State lawmakers typically keep modest quarters near the Capitol to use when they’re in town, with help from their tax-free expense allowance of $28,000 a year.

Assemblyman Tony Mendoza bought a three-bedroom home instead, paying $463,000 for it after his 2006 election.

“If you bought property, property values would go higher,” said the Democrat, whose main home is in Artesia. “So I figured as soon as I get there [Sacramento], I will buy the house.”

But now he is one of at least 10 legislators who didn’t fare well in a real estate climate that once showed no sign of cooling. The housing market tanked, the recession lingered and legislators’ pay was cut.

Unlike some predecessors who made handsome profits on second residences in Sacramento or in their districts before the downturn, these lawmakers have found themselves unable to pay their mortgages or stuck with homes that would sell at a loss, or both.

At least five have endured foreclosures or short sales. The others have hung on; to do so, at least three have depended on people who work for them — and in Mendoza’s case, on a campaign donor as well.

As Mendoza nears the end of his final Assembly term, he says he owes $150,000 more on his Sacramento home than it’s worth. A longtime campaign contributor, Cecy Groom, who is also his accountant, rounded up investments of $42,000 to help him keep the home on Soaring Hawk Lane.

Read More

Posted by on Aug 6, 2012 in Local Government | 7 comments