SD County REO/SS Sales&Pricing

Thoughts regarding San Diego’s detached and attached sales + pricing mix:

1.  Elective sellers plan around the seasons.

2.  Bank-involved sales aren’t as seasonal, and appear to be well-managed.

3.  This wasn’t the year of the short sale. 

There were only 5% more short sales completed during the first 10 months of 2011, than in the same period of 2010.  Next year might get a boost from the threat of the debt-relief tax exemption expiring at the end of 2012, but sellers sure are nonchalant about selling/giving up the free-rent program.

 4.  Generally, the county-wide pricing is on a very slow descent, and mostly flat this year. 

Share A House

From marketwatch.com:

These aren’t just friends turned roommates. Couples, multigenerational families and people with no relationship to each other are joining the growing ranks of those who are in “doubled-up” households.

Technically, these are households with at least one additional adult who is not in school, and not the householder’s spouse or partner. This year about 30% of adults, 69.2 million people, are living in doubled-up households, compared with 27.7%, or 61.7 million, in 2007, according to a September report on income, poverty and health insurance from the Census Bureau. 

In spring 2011, there were 21.8 million doubled-up households, or 18.3% of all households, up from 19.7 million, or 17%, in spring 2007.

While the benefits of house-sharing are clear — splitting expenses and pooling resources — running such a household can be tricky. Even within a single-family household, the daily morning chaos of getting everyone out the door on time, clean and happy, is no low bar. Now double that.

Read the full article here:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/more-adults-in-doubled-up-households-2011-11-22

Real Estate’s Magic Elixir

I was ridiculed from coast to coast for saying the local real estate market was ‘abuzz’, but similar stories are slipping out.  Yesterday’s post about the downtown-SD condo market showed inventory has dropped from 600+ units last year to just 247 condos for sale currently, and sales are up.  Apparently the drop in prices, and mortgage rates around 4%, are causing more properties to be sold!

Here’s another, this one about the Phoenix market.

(P.S. I got busted by the Wall Street Journal yesterday, and told them that I would abide with their policy to only include a snippet, and direct you to their website for the full article.  Hopefully you are a subscriber!)

From the wsj.com:

PHOENIX—The Phoenix housing market is defying conventional economic theory.

Inventories of homes for sale are low, falling 41% to 21,304 in October, compared to 35,732 at the same time a year ago for Greater Phoenix, according to the Cromford Report, a market research firm in Mesa, Ariz.

The number of home sales is rising—to 6,428 in October from 5,443 in same month a year ago, according to the Cromford Report. The city’s unemployment rate is inching down and is below the national average.

The laws of supply and demand suggest housing prices should be rising, or at least stop falling. But they continue to decline, due to a flood of bargain-hunting investors who still dominate the market, as well as conservative bank appraisals. As a result, economic recovery in what was once one of the country’s most dynamic cities is being held back.

The monthly median price for a previously owned, single-family home in Greater Phoenix sank 5% to $120,000 in October from $127,500 a year earlier. The national median was $165,400 in September, the latest month reported by the National Association of Realtors.

Over the same time, as prices weakened, unit sales rose 18%, according to the Cromford Report.

Read the full article here:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204517204577046851524557104.html?mod=real_estate_newsreel#articleTabs%3Darticle

(Everyone mis-reads the drop in median sales price as a sign that prices are dropping, but what it really means is that more properties on the lower end are selling.  When inventories are dropping, and sales are rising, you have a healthier market.)

Is it just a seasonal drop-off? Not in San Diego.  Compare the difference above between today’s inventory with those from 12 and 24 months ago.

JFK in San Diego

From the voiceofsandiego.org:

Kennedy’s visit, on June 6, 1963, was a huge sensation. Schools let their students out to watch the president’s motorcade drive by on El Cajon Boulevard — he rode in an open “bubble car” — and thousands of fans and foes mobbed the sidewalks.  Rudford’s is still there!

Downtown Condo Market

From www.sddt.com:

Sales of San Diego condominiums have emerged as perhaps the market’s lone bright spot.

Driven by a confluence of factors, investors and traditional buyers alike have identified value in the submarket, pushing activity beyond its year-ago level while virtually all else has lagged on an annual basis.

“It’s been a remarkable year downtown,” said Alan Nevin, principal at London Real Estate Advisors.

(more…)

Santaluz-ish

What are the alternatives to buying a big bomber in Carmel Valley?

If you want a larger home, and don’t mind Poway schools or $543/month in Mello-Roos fees, then there are others at slightly more affordable rates:

Levels of CV Doom

A couple of comments were left yesterday regarding the financial stress among Carmel Valley homeowners – people who are under-employed and burning through 401k accounts to survive.

How many homeowners are stressing in 92130?

The data isn’t readily available, so you have to use your imagination.

Doom, Level One:

This article states that about twice as many people are delinquent as those who are in foreclosure (defined as more than 30 days late but haven’t received a foreclosure notice):

http://www.dsnews.com/articles/past-due-mortgages-6298000-2011-11-18

Let’s extrapolate – there are 68 SFRs in 92130 that are currently on the NOD or NOT lists.  Doubling that makes another 136 who are delinquent, and 68 + 136 = 204 houses in trouble today.

If there are a rolling 200 houses or so on the distressed list, we should be fine.  There were 58 detached short-sale or REO listings that sold in 2010, and 61 have already closed this year.  So if we’re ramping up to 70-90 distressed sales per year, and we keep selling 300+ total houses each year, the blend should be tolerable.  The servicers will dole out the free rent as needed, push for short sales, and regulate the flow to keep the balance.  Hopefully.  If a renegade servicer floods the market, then we’ll get to test my theory that prices could go up.

According to the tax rolls, there are 9,647 SFRs in 92130, so the 204 makes for roughly 2.1% of Carmel Valley homeowners that are now at risk of losing their house.

Doom, Level Two:

What about the under-employed that are still making their payments, but whose time/money is running out?  Plug in your own guess as to how many people are in that category, but first let’s note that probably 10% of the houses don’t have a mortgage – so let’s use 8,682 for those SFRs with mortgages.

Unemployment in San Diego County is roughly 10%, but counting the under-employed, let’s use an arbitrary factor of 20% who will have to sell (assuming none of them can find enough work in the coming years).

8,682 x 20% = 1,736 houses with mortgages that could be distressed.

To predict how long it could take to clear 1,736 distressed sales, let’s examine how many of the recent sales have been distressed, or somewhat-distressed.

A review of the 72 detached MLS sales closed over the last 60 days:

Brand new: 2

REO: 8

SS: 8

Less than 10% equity: 9

More than 10% equity: 45

There were 35% of the total sales that we can call distressed, but just because you had equity doesn’t mean you weren’t feeling it.  There were 32 of the 72, or 44% who sold for a loss, so even if they had plenty of equity they must have had some duress to sell for less than they paid. 

I think we can say that at least a third, and probably half of the current sellers are under some pressure to sell.

There have been an average of 35 houses sell per month this year, so let’s call 17 of those at least somewhat-distressed.  If there are 1,736 to work through, then 1,736/17 = 102-month supply – or 8.5 years to clear the market. 

Homeowners in CV tend to hang on as long as possible, and with the generous free-rent programs being employed by the can-kicking lenders, will the next 5-10 years be an orderly marketplace?  I think so – I think half of the recent sellers probably needed to sell, and not only have sales been orderly, the pricing has held up too.

Once the stronger hands have replaced those forced to move, it will leave a solid marketplace full of long-term residents who probably won’t be thinking much about selling.

Doom, Level Three:

An interesting note while counting the number of houses – 64% of the carmel Valley SFRs were built prior to 2001.  Generally there is no correlation between age of home and distress, but CV is known for it’s long-time owners.  How many of those with plenty of equity will be leaving town in the coming years, and add to the supply?

Doom, Level Four:

Are there enough buyers who are willing and able to keep paying this year’s average $329/sf?

Of the 72 buyers, there were 17% who paid all-cash, which is about the same as it’s been lately.  Financing terms today are extremely attractive, and the relative shortage of quality inventory could be masking actual demand.  Will the troubles around the world permeate into the better markets and undermine sales and pricing, or drive a flight to quality?

Doom, Level Five:

Natural disasters, civil unrest, political ineptitude, etc. could all cause a meltdown, but just a slow, but steady descent in pricing could cause more defaults by those who are comfortable now.  If you are the type who worries a lot, you can let your imagination go crazy in Level Five.

Summary

As long as there are buyers willing to maintain the current levels of sales and pricing, we should be able to work through the distressed sales as they are dripped out to us – keeping us at Level Two. 

Should the servicers cut loose and increase the foreclosure activity by 25% or more, and flood the market with additional short-sale and REO listings at very attractive pricing (under today’s), we could see a surge in sales – if there is pent-up demand.  But who knows how crazy it could get with today’s political climate – did you see the opinion piece in the WSJ suggesting that Obama should decline a second term, and let Hillary Clinton be the candidate?

Freddie Clamps Down On Fraud

From HW:

Freddie Mac will force parties involved in a short sale to sign affidavits making them liable for their negligent or intentional misrepresentations in the deal, an effort to be sure it’s an arms-length transaction, according to guidance released Friday.

The new affidavit will go into effect Jan. 1, but Freddie is asking servicers to implement the change immediately to fight fraud. However this, and other changes, are meant to expedite the process of getting borrowers in default relocated.

In August, the government-sponsored enterprise alerted real estate agents to the rise in shady short sale deals. The main concern is flopping. There is a growing trend of real estate agents on the buy-side of the deal failing to disclose other bids on the property, rigging the sale at a lower price.

The fraudsters can then flip it, sometimes the same day, and pocket the difference.

In the third quarter, Freddie completed 11,744 short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure, according to its financial statement. It completed nearly 33,500 of these two foreclosure alternatives in all of 2011.

CoreLogic noted an increase in property fraud in 2011 tied specifically to flopping.

“With this change, you will have more information to identify potential mortgage fraud and a clearer understanding of the intent of all parties involved in the real estate transaction,” Freddie said in the guidance to mortgage servicers.

The guidance put out Friday also trimmed other rules to help servicers speed up the loss-mitigation process.

The GSE also required all amounts paid in the transaction, including anything going to the borrower, be documented fully in the HUD-1 Settlement Statement.

Freddie eliminated the requirement that borrowers more than 120 days delinquent have to list their home for sale before becoming eligible for a deed-in-lieu.

Pin It on Pinterest