Written by Jim the Realtor

June 23, 2014

The ‘analysts’ can’t blame the housing market on the cold winter any more.

The numbers look weak because you are comparing them to last year’s frenzy era (one of the hottest of all-time) plus sellers are asking too much!

From: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101767459

Widely watched measures of existing home sales and new home sales this week, as well as the latest release of the S&P Case-Shiller Housing Price Index, are expected to shed fresh light on the state of the housing market in America. And with the housing market appearing to lag the rest of the economy, that could have a big effect on where equities are heading.

“These housing numbers are the granddaddy of all numbers, if you ask me,” said Anthony Grisanti of GRZ Energy. “If these numbers do not come out good this week, you’re going to look at an S&P that’s going to be a lot weaker. … I don’t think the market or economy can sustain a few more months of weak housing.”

At this point, economists are looking for a mild uptick. Economists polled by Reuters expect existing home sales to register a 1.4 percent rise in May, slightly stronger than the one-month increase of 1.3 percent in April. New home sales are also expected to rise at a slightly faster pace.

Still, the broader picture remains almost oddly dour. On Thursday, the Mortgage Bankers Association chopped its 2014 home sales forecast to 5.28 million, which would be the first yearly decline since 2010.

“We’ve basically had almost a year of pretty lackluster performance in housing,” said Megan McGrath, senior homebuilding analyst at MKM Partners. “It started last year with the interest rate spike, and we’re about to anniversary out a pretty disappointing full year. We’ve had a litany of reasons why—mortgage rates, the government shutdown, the bad winter—and then we got out to April and May and we’re all scratching our heads because we don’t have an excuse for this one.”

Robert Wetenhall, homebuilding analyst with RBC Capital Markets, pins the blame on high-level factors.

“We are still adhering to our cautious view,” he wrote in a recent note. “Continued dislocation in the labor market, which is impeding household formation, and reduced affordability driven by increased financing costs and higher home prices” are all dampening housing.

McGrath does point to the problem of affordability, but adds that the disappointing 12 months prior have “basically taken the life out of the housing market. The housing market needs momentum, because a house is a psychologically driven purchase,” and at this point, “you have nothing telling you that now is the time to buy one.”

At this point, investors continue to look for numbers that are flat to slightly positive.

“I wouldn’t expect big things out of May, but what would be surprising is a significant deterioration,” the analyst told CNBC.com.

5 Comments

  1. Jiji

    I think you will see some price reductions, followed by inventory reductions, followed by economic stats reductions.
    IMO anyway.

  2. avgjoe

    It is generational buying opportunity, get on board.

  3. Jim the Realtor

    Can you comment on this analysis?

    Not odd, just fewer homes for sale on the cheaper end:

    Let’s use San Diego County as the example for the West. Here are the detached-homes sold under $250,000:

    2009 = 5,707
    2010 = 3,566
    2011 = 4,250
    2012 = 3,955
    2013 = 1,499
    2014 = 297 so far

    At first glance it appears that the market has fallen apart. Doomers jump on it without looking any further.

    There isn’t a perfect relationship because some listed the previous year closed the following year. But here are the number of houses listed for sale under $250,000:

    2009 = 4,814
    2010 = 8,543
    2011 = 8,195
    2012 = 7,568
    2013 = 4,073
    2014 = 1,012

    The “overpriced-ness” runs throughout the market place, and you could make a case that the disease is worse on the lower end just because sellers see so few for sale. There will still be plenty of homes this year listed under $250,000 that don’t sell. Why? Because they should be under $200,000, or even lower.

    The location and quality has dropped considerably too, but there are 72 for sale right now if you want one. They are in Campo (11), Jacumba, Pine Valley, Potrero, Borrego Springs (14), El Cajon (1), Fallbrook (2), Escondido (2), Encanto (4), and a few others.

    In 2009 there were 440 houses sold in Oceanside under $250,000. Today there is one for sale, in Oceana which is 55 and older. It is all original from 1969, and a gut job:

    http://www.redfin.com/CA/Oceanside/3747-Vista-Campana-S-92057/unit-97/home/3309641

    There is no shortage of buyers for the cheapies in decent condition and in decent areas. There just aren’t any laying around.

  4. Jim the Realtor

    Thanks avgjoe.

    For those of you who have kids, ask yourself – how are they going to buy a house?

    Should you do something for them now? Contact me for more help!

Klinge Realty Group - Compass

Jim Klinge
Klinge Realty Group

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home?

Contact Jim the Realtor!

CA DRE #01527365CA DRE #00873197

Pin It on Pinterest