7 Comments

1. 

   Peter on April 12, 2011 at 3:20 pm

   All of a sudden this attorney is an epidemiologist/toxicologist??? I hope the affected locals’ karma isn’t permanently shifted…they may come back as cogent humans.

2. 

   Daniel(theotherone) on April 12, 2011 at 4:01 pm

   What a lot of of people do not understand is that attorneys need to become very familiar with whatever experts the case may require. To take a deposition of an expert, you need to be up on the field, or the expert will blow you off with “expert speak”.

3. 

   Peter on April 12, 2011 at 8:32 pm

   Daniel,

   You’re correct. This guy is shrewd and has his smooth palaver down for the media; however, I have a hard time believing that a municipality like Encinitas would have cleared this site without an elevated degree of caution. Misinformation about unpronounceable chemicals spreads through a neighborhood like a hemorrhagic virus. Before you know it, exhaust fumes from I-5 begin to cause terminal cancers. Please reference the insipid and infamous case brought by Erin Brokovich (Masry) against PG&E.

4. 

   Jerry on April 13, 2011 at 6:22 am

   To Peter,

   You must not pay attention much to the city of encinitas.

5. 

   RC on July 29, 2011 at 4:52 pm

   Anyone know if anything further ever came of this? Anyone have any thoughts on how the potential chemical risk, or the on-going construction over the next couple of years, will affect the short term value of the surrounding homes?

6. 

   Jim the Realtor on July 31, 2011 at 8:16 am

   I haven’t heard anything else, but owners in the area should feel the need to disclose it.

7. 

   RC on July 31, 2011 at 11:12 am

   In case anyone else is following this, a little more info…
   http://www.theleucadiablog.com/2011/07/easy-to-please-simpleton-writes.html