Written by Jim the Realtor

August 1, 2011

More recent foreclosures of formerly-million-dollar homes around south Carlsbad:

10 Comments

  1. Mozart

    What’s interesting is that basically all 4 just “went down with the ship”. Why?

    I’m guessing they just didn’t want the hassle of a short sale because they knew that short sale or foreclosure, they are out of the game for years to come. Now, where to rent a 4,000 sf house that is full of all that stuff? Should be a bunch of garage sales with McFurnishings.

  2. LM

    Mozart

    You can’t get 3-4 years of free rent program if you sell to avoid foreclosure!

  3. Susie

    A McMansion @ $1.225 million with NO down payment? What bank was that, Jim? I’m just shaking my head…

  4. FutureRSFbuyer

    @Anon – 17940 El Brazo does look like a good deal. I just wonder if Cielo is too isolated. Still trying to figure that out.

    I have also heard that it is very windy in Cielo. Anyone else heard that?

  5. Mozart

    LM- I’m not so sure about that. It would seem if you want to game the system to get maximum free rent you play footsy with the servicer and talk and talk to earn the free rent. I could be wrong.

    Also, I imagine the banks are seeing an opportunity to get more back on the higher end, better located properties which will sell at just under retail, (there must be an algorithm for this). My guess is that if you’ve got a $1MM home then you are more likely to have a bank take action than if you were in a $500K home. Maybe playing footsy wasn’t responded to either?

  6. Mozart

    The problem with the LA Times article, actually from the “Manhattan Institutes City Journal”, is this little nugget in her logic where she talks about underwater homeowners:

    “This all adds up to $196 billion in dead-weight debt in California that isn’t backed by property value. If home prices were to fall by an additional 5% — not an unlikely scenario — that figure would rise to $225 billion.”

    But what if prices rise by 5%? It would seem we’d erase the dead-weight.

    Basing our national budget on current revenues or using this moment in time as the meter for all financial measures is misguided.

  7. livinincali

    “But what if prices rise by 5%? It would seem we’d erase the dead-weight.”

    Really, let’s try a little simple math and see.

    If a 5% decline is = 225-196 = 29 billion then a 5% increase in prices would result is the dead weight being 196-29 = 167 billion. Of course 167 billion these days is nothing.

Klinge Realty Group - Compass

Jim Klinge
Klinge Realty Group

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home?

Contact Jim the Realtor!

CA DRE #01527365CA DRE #00873197

Pin It on Pinterest