Why the higher-end market is a little sluggish compared to the rest? It’s because $2,000,000 still doesn’t buy you much in the tonier parts of town:
Why the higher-end market is a little sluggish compared to the rest? It’s because $2,000,000 still doesn’t buy you much in the tonier parts of town:
There is no compelling leader to command and direct the real estate community, and I’ll live with that.
But to have the assumed leader – the local president of the association of realtors – give wrong advice in the main newspaper is ridiculous and makes us all look bad:
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/may/01/homebuyers-afford-mortgage-prequalify-home-loan/
Buy a house for 1.5x your annual income?
I don’t see anyone making $200,000 a year buying a $300,000 house.
The rule of thumb has ALWAYS been 2.5 to 3.0 x annual income, depending on down payment, and with rates so low it should be even higher today.
In So CA people buy (lease) cars that are 1x income! Homes have to be 4-5x income right now, or at least the loan amount after down payment. Working couple makes 200k a year, buys 1M$ home with 200k down and carries 800k loan at 4%. Its a stretch but what do you do?
Now the C.A.R. has picked up the local article and is running it on its website, espousing our president’s view that you should buy 1.5x your income.
http://www.car.org
We look like clowns in the circus.