Homebuyer Tax Credit Update

Written by Jim the Realtor

February 22, 2010

From the latimes.com:

Despite blizzards that shut federal offices for days, the Internal Revenue Service issued new guidance Feb. 12 on the two tax credit programs that are powering the country’s real estate markets — the $6,500 credit for repeat buyers and the $8,000 first-time buyer credit.

The new IRS policy clarified documentation that taxpayers need to submit to successfully obtain either credit. When Congress revised the credit programs in November, it ordered the IRS to tighten its rules and monitoring to curtail widespread frauds that had emerged earlier in 2009.

These included fictitious home purchases in which people claimed and received $8,000 checks from the government on transactions that had never occurred. .

To avoid such abuses in the revised credit program — which is scheduled to be available for qualified purchases closed through June 30 — Congress directed the IRS to spell out documentation standards in detail and to install monitoring systems to spot fraud upfront. Among the keys to the monitoring system is that all documentation accompanying credit claims comply with the IRS’ detailed rules.

Here’s what the agency wants:

* A fully executed IRS Form 5405 (available at www.irs.gov) on which taxpayers provide information supporting their claim of eligibility, including income and home purchase date.

* A copy of the closing or settlement statement that proves the transaction took place. In instructions to taxpayers issued last month, the IRS said the statement should show “all parties’ names and signatures, property address, sales price and date of purchase.”

Normally this is the properly executed Form HUD-1, Settlement Statement. The problem, however, is that home closing and settlement customs vary from state to state, and sometimes the HUD-1 does not contain both the seller’s and the buyer’s signatures. In escrow states such as California both sets of signatures may not appear on the HUD-1 received by the buyer.

Buyers sign an estimated closing statement or an estimated HUD-1 “at the time they sign their loan documents,” said Donna Grosso, president of the California Escrow Assn. Sellers have their “estimated closing submitted to them for their review and signature during or near the same time period as the buyer. We prepare the final closing statement or the final HUD-1 on the closing date,” which is the date of recordation.

The IRS tried to address that issue Feb. 12. “In areas where signatures are not required on the settlement document, the IRS has clarified that it will accept a settlement statement if it is completed and valid according to local law,” the agency said. “The IRS encourages those buyers to sign the settlement statement prior to attaching it to the tax return. In situations where the signature of the seller is not on the settlement document, the IRS advises the buyer to still sign the document.”

Despite the fact that Form 5405 continues to require all parties’ signatures on the HUD-1 or settlement document, the IRS is now essentially saying: Don’t worry about it — as long as your settlement statement conforms to prevailing local practices, we’ll accept it.

What else does the IRS want to see on claims from home buyers? For repeat purchasers, the agency wants documentation that, before their latest purchase, they had lived in their former property for a consecutive five years out of the previous eight years. This may include property tax records, hazard insurance records or copies of annual mortgage interest statements filed with their federal taxes.

One caveat for filers: Because of the increased documentation and monitoring, IRS processing will take four to eight weeks. Don’t expect your check overnight.

 

4 Comments

  1. osidecompass

    Hey everyone, just want to echo what Jim was saying above. I work at a local CPA firm and spent about twenty hours chasing down this same information and sent out my return before the IRS posted their position. Prior to that, there really was no guidance on the 5405. I ending up sending my final HUD-1, fully executed (and signed) purchase agreement, and a copy of my grant deed. Hopefully that’s enough to prove I’m not a four year-old who had a house purchased in my name.

  2. osidecompass

    Good post Jim, hopefully this info gets out to everyone!

  3. Susie

    I’ll say it for the second time today: Jim, you’re the best! Mahalo for the update!

  4. Uncle Taxman

    And another echo of what Jim was saying above.

    I have several clients who have amended either for the credit as a new home buyer and also as the “owned five years” type.

    The amended returns appear to in some cases be held up due to the sheer volume of these requests. Also, the filing of the amended return claiming the credit appears to be an audit flag for some individuals.

    One client was listed as filing the amended return on 11/19/09 and just yesterday he was noticed with an audit letter dated 2/18/2010. The return was actually mailed in prior to the 11/09 rule changes.

    Here is what the IRS is looking for in order to resolve the audit for this particular individual and spouse:

    1. The HUD-1 statement.
    2. A copy of each of the home buyer’s driver’s license. Has the taxpayer updated the license to the new address as yet? If not, it should be done NOW. This provides proof that the taxpayer is residing at the new address according to the IRS.
    3. ONLY ONE of the following three items:
    a. Most recent pay stub. It would be best that it reflect the new address. This has to be a document dated within the last two months prior to the audit notice date.
    b. Recent bank statement. It would be best that it reflect the new address. This has to be a document dated within the last two months prior to the audit notice date.
    c. Copy of the taxpayer’s current automobile registration. Again, it would be best that it reflect the new address. In a pinch the agent stated that a copy of a current automobile insurance card with the new address could suffice so long as the address is correct (new home address). It is assumed that the insurance company would update the address sooner than the DMV might for some reason perhaps due to the insurance company requiring notice of where the car is garaged.

    I hope this helps those who are looking at filing for the credit.

Klinge Realty Group - Compass

Jim Klinge
Klinge Realty Group

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home?

Contact Jim the Realtor!

CA DRE #01527365CA DRE #00873197

Pin It on Pinterest