From the latimes.com:
After a year characterized by grumpy partisan gridlock, Congress came up with a Thanksgiving compromise that could change the mortgage choices of buyers and refinancers in more than 660 markets across the country: It raised maximum loan limits for the Federal Housing Administration while leaving loan ceilings untouched for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
In effect, this may make FHA the go-to financing option for borrowers needing loans up to $729,750 with down payments as low as 3.5% in high-cost areas of California, the District of Columbia, New York, New Jersey and scattered counties in other states including Massachusetts, Florida and North Carolina. Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-eligible loans in those areas, meanwhile, stay capped at $625,500.
Equally important, the new plan raises the FHA ceilings for purchasers in hundreds of more moderate-priced markets. Seattle-area buyers’ maximum FHA loan amount jumped to $567,500, while the Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac ceiling remains at $506,000. In Hartford, Conn., the limit for FHA is now $440,000, up from $320,850; Fannie and Freddie remain capped at $417,000.
The new loan ceilings in hundreds of markets are at the core of the compromise: They raise the maximum FHA loan amount in all areas of the country to 125% of the local median home-sale price, while leaving Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s limit at 115% of the median.
What will this mean for buyers from now through the end of 2013, when the compromise expires?
“There’s no doubt this will drive more business to FHA,” said David H. Stevens, former FHA commissioner and current president and chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Assn. “FHA is going to become the darling of the industry again,” said Annie Austin, a loan officer with Cobalt Mortgage in Bellevue, Wash.
Bob Walters, chief economist of national lender Quicken Loans, said he thinks the increased loan limits will benefit many consumers, “especially those looking to borrow larger amounts,” he said, but who “are in a credit situation where Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans are not available or optimal.”
The switch to the FHA could entail some pain, however. Tim Kepler, a loan officer with Land Home Financial in Danville, Calif., noted that the agency raised its upfront mortgage insurance premiums from 0.5% of the loan amount to 1.15% earlier this year. This will increase applicants’ closing costs over a Fannie or Freddie loan, he said.
The premium can be financed, but can add substantially to the costs of high-balance mortgages. Bruce Calabrese, president of Equitable Mortgage in Columbus, Ohio, said the hefty new premiums make “FHA too restrictive and unattractive” for most refinancers in his area, even with slightly higher loan ceilings.
Bottom line for house shoppers: Take a hard, close look at FHA with a local loan officer, in light of the rule changes. Pencil out the costs, down-payment requirements and more generous standards on credit. FHA may be your best option. But then again, the higher fees just might change your mind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other benefits of FHA financing:
1. FHA accepts credit scores under 620.
2. FHA takes higher back-end qualifying ratios – up to 58%. Fannie/Freddie caps at 45%.
3. FHA allows non-occupant co-borrowers, and you can add as many as needed.
4. Lower down payments, as low as 3.5%.
Just what we need to reinflate prices! 58% back-end qualifying ratio, 3.5% down-payment, multiple non-occupant co-borrowers, add the upfront mortgage insurance to the loan, and FICO less that 620. What could possibly go wrong?
Talk about fence sitting…Do you throw your good money (relatively speaking) away by putting down 20% against someone in the neighborhood who used FHA financing? Haven’t we seen this horror show before? Low FICOs, little down payment, etc.
The last time I checked, the PMI went up BIG time since April. For a 500K house, the monthly PMI is more than $500/mo and you have to pay that for 5 years…minimum. Is that correct, JtR?
Hmmmm…..if FHA requires a bailout, but you default with on an FHA loan, haven’t you in effect bailed yourself out? Do you get to keep the house after that? I’m so confused….
If you put down 25%, we’re pretty sure you can appeal to have mortgage insurance removed after two years. But yes, with less than that much down, it is at least five years minimum.
And I thought financing was tight!
Wow, back to bubble era terms.
Don’t most of us remember 20% down minimums, 28%/36% front/back end qualification and 8% rates on 30 year fixed loans being normal AND acceptable?