« Creeping Up the Ladder | Main | Barratt Update »

Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 06:26AM

Downtown SD Condos Update

 

Smithers asked about the trend of downtown condos - is there any uptick?  Not really.

This graph shows the monthly median sales prices, and the $-per-sf over the last three years.  As you can see, they fluctuate wildly, so the RED trend lines are probably the better indicator:

92101graph-1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales haven't improved either, and March or April have been the best months of the year lately.  But between 2005 and 2008 the closed sales have dropped 44%, from 102 t0 57 closings last month.

graph92101sales%20copy.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are currently 595 active listings of downtown condos, not counting all of the brand new units being sold by developers (though 83 of the 595 are listed as being built in 2008).  The unsolds are averaging 107 days on market, and $664/sf, where April's closed sales averaged $509/sf, which was the highest month of the year.

There are always going to be the high-priced fancy ones at the top skewing the numbers.  When looking at last month's 57 closings and taking out the 12 closings over $900,000, the numbers look more realistic.  There were 45 sales averaging $437/sf.

As long as both sales and pricing are trending downward, it would seem that we have a ways to go - on average.  But we really should factor in another variable - the view - making the analysis multi-dimensional.  A case could be made for 2 br condos being real popular when priced in the $300/sf to $400/sf range - if you can find one with a good view for $400/sf, it's probably worth a look.

 

Posted on Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 06:26AM by Registered CommenterJim the Realtor in | Comments9 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

Thanks, JtR. Yes, lots of varibles. View is big, but also building location & age, construction and feature quality, HOA competency, dues and solvency, owner occupancy, etc.

May 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSmithers

IMHO people really need to consider the HOA scenario. I've got a strong feeling the HOA's are going to start going through the roof (as if they aren't high enough yet). I've seen some that have popped $100-$150 recently and from what I can tell it has mostly to do with the number of units that are in the rears on their "dues".

This trend is likely to get worse and the HOA's are going to be usury in the not so distant future. I'm guessing the first thing people stop paying are their HOA's followed by their taxes and then finally their mortgage.

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSD_Coastal

It's also important to consider sub-markets in downtown San Diego. East Village versus Little Italy are two completely different stories. Something similar to an east/west of the 5 scenario.

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMozart

From the U/T March 2008 DataQuick numbers;

Resales 3/07= 54 ($565K)
Resales 3/08= 45 ($534K) -5.5%

New 3/07= 55 ($425K)
New 3/08= 55 ($641K) +51%

Average +18.0%

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMozart

Yes, there are a lot of variables in 92101. Marina High rises are much different from 2-story East Village.

But I feel strongly that +51% for new condos is skewed because the Electra Tower went up with 200 units around or over $1,000,000. What's not reported is that most of those buyers put their 10% down a long time ago, and now they're totally underwater. The MLS is flooded with those units which are now 100+ DOM and well below original sales price. Now they're all resales, not new. That building is EMPTY. I also believe it's a similar story for Icon, Smart Corner, and other towers. Let's not forget about Bayside and a couple others that are going up. Can someone say "inventory?"

To further exacerbate the problem, HOA's for these buildings are around $750/mo. That alone is about $100,000 buying power wiped out if you're taking on a mortgage. That's a big pill to swallow, and it probably won't get any better. Those HOA's are full of old ladies (no offense to old ladies) who want their windows washed 5 times a year, someone at the front desk at all times, the hallways vacuumed twice a day, etc.

Finally, the UT is a total homer when it comes to real estate. It's right there with the NAR. And DataQuick seems to be their lackey IMO.

Thanks for the data Jim. More great info, as always.

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterThe Blur

Good article Jim. Glad to see there are at least some RE professionals not spinning all the bad news. This was balanaced and fair. I think the trend is still lower through '09 and as rates keep creeping up, that continues to push prices lower for the foreseeable future. I'm still on the sidelines for now. Keep up the great work.

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered Commenternorcal_jeff

This is really good info. and insight! Well done!

May 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterOCVulture

Nice analysis. I need to put together something like this for my local market.

May 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMilan Cole

Interesting article on condo sales. They specifically mention San Diego at the end of page 2.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/business/15condo.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

May 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDwip

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>