« Let's Auction! | Main | # of I/O & Neg-Ams »

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 07:27AM

Countrywide Update

images.jpgI went to the Countrywide event yesterday at the La Costa Resort and Spa - for those who haven't seen the $140 million remodel of the Resort yet, go by and take a look - they did a nice job. 

Today's presentation was in the new ballroom, and about 250 realtors and mortgage originators were in attendance.

The main speaker was Brian Hale, President, Consumer Markets Division for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.  Here is his biography:

http://about.countrywide.com/bios/Biography.aspx?CtlID=22

He is touring the country, speaking to agents in order to set the record straight, or at least reach out in person to explain the mortgage situation from their perspective.  I was glad to see it - at least they are making an effort to defend themselves, and tell their side of the story.

He acknowledged the negative press, and went on for at least an hour about his thoughts and feelings about Countrywide, and their future -  then he took some questions.

Here are my random notes:

They are the 8th largest bank in the country, with $138 billion in bank assets - and that number increased by $30 billion in the last 60 days.  They have 'excess liquidity' currently, their loan volume is less than their intake on CDs.

They are funding all mortgages out of the bank, and keeping their jumbo loans in their portfolio until there are adequate funding sources - places to sell the loans.

CFC has 64,000 employees. 

In his division, Mr. Hale has had to cut 3,600 jobs and lower his budget by $340 million.

Predicts that of the loans funded in his division next year, 15% to 20% will be for purchasing an REO property.  It used to be 2%.

Countrywide Bank had just changed to a savings and loan, overseen by a different regulator - the OTS - in June of this year.  The jumbo money dried up the second week of August after Bear Stearns and others began writing off billions of dollars in losses.  Countrywide was forced to scramble, and convert their loan documents over to the Bank in just two days, to keep their fundings on-going.

The $11 billion credit line that they were ridiculed for tapping (in full) was an emergency line that they have paid $10 million per year to maintain - just in case of an event like this.

37 states have no licensing requirements for mortgage brokers.

The new guidelines that were implemented in February, 2007, eliminated 15% to 20% of the buyers at that time.

 http://www.ofheo.gov/media/pdf/PRGuidance121306.pdf

There were pools of mortgages created in 2006 where 40% of the borrowers didn't make the first payment - mostly due to fraud.

Countrywide Bank is efficient, they only have 1,100 employees, and they utilize ATM's, kiosks in Countrywide retail-loan-processing locations, and good internet service.  US Bank, a similar-sized bank ($136 billion) has 61,000 employees.

The average age of the Bank's depositor is 67 years old - rate shoppers.

There are 1,000 changes coming to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines - mostly "add-ons", extra charges for any reason outside of the perfect loan/borrower.  They are going to price-in all the risk (or at least as much as possible).

All big banks will eliminate their wholesale/broker divisions and fund retail operations only, due to the weak quality of loans/high delinquency.

Bill Dallas, founder of both First Franklin and OwnIt Mortgage (both acquired by Merrill Lynch - one  mortgage executive said that some Merrill officials are calling its $100 million investment in OwnIt one of the worst investments the mortgage group has ever made...)  - the Countrywide guy didn't mention this, I brought it up because I am still shaking my head as to why Merrill made this deal - I'd like to meet this Bill Dallas guy someday.

Anyway, Bill Dallas said there were 57,000 mortgage brokerage operations in the US, employing on average around 7 people.  He predicted that half would be out of business in 12 months, and half of the other half in the following 12 months. (or 300,000 total out of the business - with 100,000 left throughout the country)

Six states have passed laws that include criminal penalties and jail time for realtors and mortgage brokers that do things that aren't in the buyer's interest.  The first state to try and pass a similar law, Massachusetts, was threatened by Countrywide and other lenders that they would stop funding loans in the state.  But Massachusetts went ahead with the law.  There is a version currently in the California State Legislature, and if passed, Arnold will sign it.

The future of residential lending is that seven banks; Bank of America, Countrywide, Chase, Citi, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, and Wells Fargo will fund plain vanilla loans that are dictated by Fannie/Freddie guidelines, plus jumbo loans for their portfolio - and may sell those when the market appears.

$90 Billion written off by banks so far, and expect $480 Billion total over the next five years.

VA is doing Jumbo loans now (higher than their limit of $417,000) - I was scratching my head on this one.

The FBI has made mortgage fraud their number on goal for the next three years, and they are cracking down.  He knew of a loan originator who was a single mom of five kids whowas making $2 million a year in commissions and was busted by the FBI over a $100,000 fraudulent loan she did, and is facing 77 years in jail. 

He thinkgs it is very likely that FHA limits will rise to $417,000 soon, and that FHA is the future. 

He also believes that the Fannie/Freddie limit increases were brought up at a bad time, and they had no choice but to deny them.  But he thought we'd see it again, and it would eventually be passed - maybe even up to the $1 million Fannie loan.

Countrywide Bank has $38 Billion in excess capacity, and another $18 Billion in cash - I'm not sure what the difference is.

Could some outside entity purchase Countrywide?  The stock closed at $12.51 today, and he said the book value is $24 - some overseas company could get interested at some point, but he knew of none.  He re-iterated that Bank of America was not a candidate, due to their recent purchase of LaSalle Bank - resulting in BofA having to divest itself of branches to lower their total deposits under the required 10% of the total bank deposits in the country.

Countrywide has $1.5 trillion in loans in its portfolio.

Arizona and Nevada real estate will be hit a lot worse than California.

He thought the Fed would be forced to lower their Fed Funds rate by 150 basis points by spring, which could put the 10-year Treasury around 3%, and mortgage rates in the 5% to 5.5% range.  He discussed some of the "unevenness" of the spread between the 10-year and mortgage rates, admitting that lagging on rate changes is a profit center.  The lower rates would "stabilize the drop".

Answers to questions from the audience:

He didn't know enough about the Bush rate-freeze, but said that Countrywide has already been doing modifications. From what he could tell, the rate-freeze wasn't that well thought out, and probably wouldn't be used much.  He believed that borrowers will need to provide income documentation (tax returns on all candidates), and borrowers will have to sign a form stating that their income/verification is accurate and true under penalty of $10,000 and 2 years in jail.  He didn't think many will sign that.

They've added 2,500 employees to loan administration for short sales.

Reverse mortgages for senoirs are growing 80% annually.

Called Cramer a "snapperhead', but pointed out that even Cramer recommends to NOT try and time the stock market - same thing with real estate, buy a property because it suits other needs - shelter, security, safety, and schools.

Mortgage Bankers Association said there were 530,000 loan originators at the peak, there are under 200,000 now, and by next year will be around 125,000.

Countrywide and other lenders will start foregoing any collection of HELOCs if it'll help them get the first mortgage under the Fannie Mae limit of $417,000 for a refinance.

 Last question - from me, I asked him to comment on the $51 billion they got from the Atlanta Fed, and he said that the Atlanta Fed is their regional location due to Countrywide Bank being chartered in Virginia (sounded like they bought an existing bank).  Sen. Schumer made a big stink on Capitol Hill, issuing a press release that said, "Countrywide is treating the Federal Home Loan Bank system like its personal ATM”.

The head of the Atlanta Fed wrote back, stating that Countrywide was in full compliance, and that the Atlanta Fed knew how to conduct their business and for Sen. Schumer to keep his big nose out of it.  Countrywide was never close to their limit of borrowing with the Fed.   It kind of felt like he was dodging the question.

Then we heard from Hank Lopez, from the Home Retention division (formerly Loss Mitigation Department)

He said it is taking 4-6 weeks to get an answer once you send in a full package to Countrywide on a short sale - include the offer to purchase.

You don't have to be delinquent to get a short sale. (hard to believe)

They don't start processing a notice of default until at least 90 days late.

They have gone paperless, and once you send a full package in, it takes them 5-7 days to download it onto their systemt, then assign it to a processor.  Each processor has 100-150 files thet are working on at one time.

They are receiving 400 new short sales packages every day.

They are processing around 60,000 files currently in loss mitigation, 2/3 foreclosures, and 1/3 short sales. 

For every short sale they resolve, three more are coming in.

(they are buried, lots of complaints from audience members - but others spoke in glowing terms)

He said the difference in response times is due to dealing with different investors - and their unique criteria/work load. 

They are issuing a promissory note if they feel the borrower has means, though they charge no interest and they are un-secured notes.  They aren't doing any asset searches either.

They are not evicting any non-paying borrowers, and aren't loading up additional junk fees for doing short sales.

All in all, it was very informative and rather revealing - I give the guys credit for at least laying it on the line.  There wasn't any boasting, or guarantees that they were going to make it - just lots of confidence that they are doing the right things and picking up market share.

One point that Hale dwelled on was that mortgage brokers are cooked, and that in the near future there will be primarily retail bank employees funding in-house loans, plus a few stragglers.  He expects to keep hiring the good brokers, he has over 200 in the hiring process currently.

 

Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 07:27AM by Registered CommenterJim the Realtor in , | Comments29 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (29)

Thanks, lots of good info there.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterNo_Such_Reality


NC Times Article


"They all think it's going to go to zero, and they're going to be in for a surprise."

What's he talking about? Does anybody here think it is going to zero?

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBear

Interesting stuff.

Problem with their claim on assets is a lot of the assets are level 3. So the valuations are to models. We already saw a lot of that stuff go for less than fifty cents on the dollar.

Secondly they are offering very high intrest rates to pull in deposits. So they have to produce on that.

Third they have a lot of REO on the books listed as assets. When they sell that stuff they will have to book the losses.

Fourth they are selling more shakey loans to roll over bad debt with more bad debt. Not sure how long until the Fed cries enough.

Merry Christmas Jim

Laef2

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLAEF2

Modifying loan contracts is a disgrace!

Countrywide is toast and this market will not recover for at least 3 years.

Some dude from the NAR yesterday said"We anticipate home prices to stabilize and perhaps even increase in 2008".

What dope is he smoking?

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMike

Wow, you wrote a pretty balanced article. I think that makes you a better man that I... I couldn't write such a balanced article about Countrywide.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergreenlander

The government forcing one party to modify a loan contract is a disgrace.

Both parties sitting down to renegotiate a contract is good business, IMO.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterNoCoCivil

CFC going to BK

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJohn

Are those 330K Loan Originators being counted in the National Unemployment number?

Jim,
Your question should have been how much money did CW and/or its executives give in campaign contributions over the past few years?

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSMC

Countrywide made multiple loans to Casey Serin.
Countrywide still owns 410 Avocado.
Mortgage Brokers are following Travel Agents down the path of disintermediation.
Countrywide Bank is a good bank. How can we investors invest in just the bank portion?
The $24 book value is trailing and does not recognize any legal liability, dividend suspension, asset write downs or portfolio impairment.

Pathetic.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRob Dawg

Great read Jim. Thanks.

Bill Miller of Legg Mason said CFC was a buy. We shall see, maybe a buy under $5 in 2009 if they are going to make it.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered Commenternorcal ray

He discussed some of the "unevenness" of the spread between the 10-year and mortgage rates, admitting that lagging on rate changes is a profit center.

This disgusts me. They can borrow from the government at 4 and still charge almost 6 for short term loans - this is government support of business pure and simple. Too big to fail.

Someone should start a new loan group without all the "history" and undercut these guys.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBrian

Jim, did you get a 'Let's defend this house!' wristband?

Very nice write-up, sir. Thanks!

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjg

I thought the quote about no longer writing loans through the broker channel was interesting. Two things: 1.I do not understand why big banks with nationwide branches need brokers anyway, 2.How will people earn a living in SD county. How many recent purchases in North County Coastal have been to Mortgage or Real estate brokers, I think your articles have mentioned quite a few. Who is going to buy homes in the future if these jobs disappear? Any ideas?

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLV Renter

nice right up. You certainly asked the right question. They can't get money selling their loans to wall street investors anymore, but they can give these same worthless loans to a fed bank as "collateral" and get cash that way? Somethings wrong with this picture.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterlbids

Jim,

As Greenlander noted, a very balanced article. Well worth our read.

One thing stuck out for me:
He discussed some of the "unevenness" of the spread between the 10-year and mortgage rates, admitting that lagging on rate changes is a profit center. The lower rates would "stabilize the drop".

Wow! It looks like the Fed is helping prop up the bank losses. Brian commented on this above. The cost? Inflation. The benefit? We still have a banking system. I'm not happy with everything, but I still want there to be an economy in 2009. ;)

The implications... are large.

Good luck in 2008 Jim!

Got popcorn?
Neil

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterNeil

Neil,

The banking system is the very reason we have inflation. Those at the fed responsible for the current debacle should be brought up on charges of treason imo. How dare they deliberately destroy the economy for their gain.

My shorts went through the roof today after the rate cut. I'm not sure even a cut below 300 can do anything other than make the problem much worse, especially considering it's (the rate cut) already been somewhat priced into today's markets.

Once I can buy a nice house close to the ocean in Encinitas for 1/2 a mil things will be getting back to normal. Until then the streets can flow with the blood of the nonbelievers for all I care.

Oh yeah, nice write up Jim. I appreciate all you do on this blog, even if I don't always agree with your opinion.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterGenius

I have this nice graph that shows the years 1925-1933 on the x axis and the Dow on the Y. (I don't have it electronically unfortunately) It plots the run up and down in the stock market along with quotes from prominent economists, heads of industry and politicians making predictions and comments about stability and promising futures. None were accurate but probably all self serving. The final quote is FDR saying approximately they are sealing all bank deposits. Did anyone look at this guys picture?!! I hope he brought his cardiologist along with him. Wow, put the pork chop down and step away. Mr Hale going out to speak is like Kevin Bacon in Animal house at the parade scene yelling "remain calm, all is well" as people run frantically for safety.

Jim, you wrote a very nice article and I commend you for your efforts.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPsuedo

Thanks for the kind words - information like this should be in the hands of every buyer and seller.

On campaign contributions, Mr. Hale did note that the same day that Schumer issued the blast against CFC, he was also glowing about the Citigroup/Abu Dhabi deal out the other side of his mouth.

“It seemed to me that this is good for Citigroup, it’s good for jobs in New York. It bolsters their capital position, allows what is fundamentally a very strong company to weather a difficult time,” said Mr. Schumer.

Schumer's top nine contributors since 1989:

$458,440 - Goldman Sachs
$399,716 - Citigroup
$325,200 - JPMorgan Chase
$298,946 - Morgan Stanley
$230,350 - Bear Stearns
$226,150 - Merrill Lynch
$214,250 - UBS
$199,044 - Credit Suisse
$181,450 - Lehman Brothers

$2,533,546 - Total

Notice any similarities between the contributors?

By the way, Schumer's Current Committee
Assignments:

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Finance
Judiciary
Rules and Administration

December 11, 2007 | Registered CommenterJim the Realtor

Shawne Merriman, claiming a Titans player illegally hit him, told the U-T: "There were a bunch of cheap shots out there, but they can get some cheap seats on the sofa at home while they watch us [in the playoffs]."

December 11, 2007 | Registered CommenterJim the Realtor

Sorry Jim but the best the Chargers can hope for is to win the wild card and lose to the Pats. Thus speaketh the guy who still owes you a premium coffee plus accumulated interest.

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRob Dawg

If anybody can beat the Pats, which is unlikely - it's the Chargers. How could it happen?

1. Pats players, coaches,and fans slip into "juggernaut exhaustion".

2. If we can get them into overtime, we'll win - we're younger.

3. Norv is actually calling some plays!

4. Pats start imitating the 'lights-out dance" again. Look what it did to the Titans last Sunday. LanDale White scores a touchdown against the Chargers and imitates both Shawne Merriman and LT in the endzone. What happened next? Chargers score three touchdowns to come from 14 points behind in the fourth quarter to win in overtime.

The Chargers are still mad about losing last year to the Pats at home, and your guys doing Merriman's dance on the field/in the tunnel afterwards. Sure, the game will be in New England, but that'l give us more reason to rise up - nobody will think we have a chance.

Here is the youtube if you need a reminder:

Pats Disrespect Chargers

December 11, 2007 | Registered CommenterJim the Realtor

Every morning I say to myself:

"Either I can drive three hours to Camarillo for a premium coffee experience, or be drinking Folgers in five minutes."

Most days it's a tough call.

December 11, 2007 | Registered CommenterJim the Realtor

Why did countrywide not fire MR. Hale and his disciples also along with 3600 people?

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterI_hate_countrywide

Ownit purchase was likely worst investment EVER! MER and Ownit people should be in stockades, but no they got the cushy platinum parachutes.

If there are so many many ex brokers, realtors, etc, how come San Diego hasn't ssen any downturn? Where are all the outdoor furniture, BBQ, pool, store closings??

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEqualizer

I'd say Wachovia buying World Savings at the top is another "brilliant" move by some "experts."

Equalizer,

If you go into those stores, even in the better parts of town, you'll see the slowdown. Visit them & ask them how business is doing. Lots of recessionary indicators that haven't hit the official stats just yet.

Thank you for the report, Jim! Your hard work is very much appreciated!

December 11, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterCA renter

OK, from Motgate101 we see that any loan of than 10 years runs about seven (7!!!) percent. (Wow, the rates are *inverted* aren't they!).

If I open my new lending group with access to the fed funds and write one billion in loans (about 2000-4000 loans) at 6.25 percent and take money from the fed at 4.25 percent, I clear about 20,000,000 (twenty million).

That should be enough to employ at least 100 people with profit. Can I write ~3000 loans with 100 people given this aggressive rate (30 loans per employee)?

I think so.

Do we have a business plan here?

December 12, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBrian

This whole thing reminds me of when I had Pan Am reward tickets in hand for a trip of a lifetime. Just before the trip, I heard all the rumors about Pan Am going under, and called them to ask who would honor my tickets if that were to happen. The lady on the phone assured me that there was absolutely nothing wrong with Pan Am, and the rumors were lies! Ten days later Pan Am was gone. My tickets were trash. So, how much faith do I put in Countrywide's speech? I pulled my CD money out.

December 12, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSimone

They are not evicting any non-paying borrowers,

How many of these do they have?

December 13, 2007 | Unregistered Commenteraudax

They are not evicting any non-paying borrowers

They're not... So the borrower gets to live there forever? I don't understand.

December 13, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterCrash Random

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>