<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bubbleinfo.com &#187; REO Counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/category/reo-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s guide to North San Diego County Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SD Foreclosure Graphs</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/05/25/sd-foreclosure-graphs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/05/25/sd-foreclosure-graphs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 06:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying at Trustee Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=8356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a rebound lately in the number of weekly trustee sales resulting in REOs, but still relatively low numbers overall, compared to where we think they should be:

Below is the quarterly chart for the last three years.  Even though the foreclosure moratoriums are mostly expired, there haven&#8217;t been more properties getting foreclosed than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">There has been a rebound lately in the number of weekly trustee sales resulting in REOs, but still relatively low numbers overall, compared to where we think they should be:</p>
<p><img src='http://www.foreclosureradar.com/webservices/chart/chart.php?LocationValue=6073&#038;ChartTitle=San%20Diego%20County%20Trustee-Sale%20Results%2C%20Weekly&#038;FLXID=49d440a6d6740&#038;ChartType=2&#038;LocationType=FIPS&#038;LocationState=CA&#038;TimeUnits=week&#038;ChartSize=4' alt="San Diego County Trustee-Sale Results, Weekly" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Below is the quarterly chart for the last three years.  Even though the foreclosure moratoriums are mostly expired, there haven&#8217;t been more properties getting foreclosed than in 2008 &#8211; but add in the cancellations and it looks to be about the same (or more) volume as 2-3 years ago.  Are banks letting people off the hook, or did defaulters get their loan mod?  Or were they just bluffing?</p>
<p><img src='http://www.foreclosureradar.com/webservices/chart/chart.php?LocationValue=6073&#038;ChartTitle=San%20Diego%20County%20Trustee-Sale%20Results%2C%20Quarterly&#038;FLXID=49d440a6d6740&#038;ChartType=2&#038;LocationType=FIPS&#038;LocationState=CA&#038;TimeUnits=quarter&#038;ChartSize=4' alt="San Diego County Trustee-Sale Results, Quarterly" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But you might be able to say that the servicers must be getting sharper on price, and/or the investors are getting more optimistic &#8211; the third-party purchases have gone up substantially since 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/05/25/sd-foreclosure-graphs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancellations are Cooking</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/26/cancellations-are-cooking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/26/cancellations-are-cooking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow Inventory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=7769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src='http://www.foreclosureradar.com/webservices/chart/chart.php?LocationValue=6073&#038;ChartTitle=San%20Diego%20County%20Trustee-Sale%20Results%2C%20Weekly&#038;FLXID=49d440a6d6740&#038;ChartType=2&#038;LocationType=FIPS&#038;LocationState=CA&#038;TimeUnits=week&#038;ChartSize=4' alt="San Diego County Trustee-Sale Results, Weekly" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">We&#8217;ve heard the rumblings about Bank of America stepping up their foreclosures, and low and behold, I got another REO listing assigned to me today. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I promptly rejected it, which I figured would secure my spot at the bottom of their list, and boom, they sent me another one, which means 2-3 in the last week when I&#8217;ve only been getting one a month.  Does it mean something is cooking?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are the overall results from the last 12 weeks for all trustees:</p>
<p><img src='http://www.foreclosureradar.com/webservices/chart/chart.php?LocationValue=6073&#038;ChartTitle=San%20Diego%20County%20Trustee-Sale%20Results%2C%20Weekly&#038;FLXID=49d440a6d6740&#038;ChartType=2&#038;LocationType=FIPS&#038;LocationState=CA&#038;TimeUnits=week&#038;ChartSize=4' alt="San Diego County Trustee-Sale Results, Weekly" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Cancellations are due to short sales closing, and loan modifications becoming permanent. There have been 2,623 cancellations over the last 60 days, and in the same period there were 925 short sales that closed on the MLS, or 35% of the total cancellations.  <strong>Can we say that about 2/3&#8217;s of the cancellations are due to loan modifications becoming permanent?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Yes, the loan modders might make their way back to market over the next few years, but for now the extend-and-pretend program is working nicely.</p>
<p>Here is the REO assigned to me today:<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGgo9VPhdd8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGgo9VPhdd8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/26/cancellations-are-cooking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recon Surge</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/14/recon-surge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/14/recon-surge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying at Trustee Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow Inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=7551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric at the North County Times mentioned the increase in Bank of America notices of trustee sale being sent out.  Click here for link to full article. 
The notices went to 230 homeowners in North San Diego County, a 69 percent increase from February.
Wow, will there will be more SFR short sales or REOs in North SD County Coastal?
There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Eric at the North County Times mentioned the increase in Bank of America notices of trustee sale being sent out.  Click <a href="http://www.nctimes.com/business/article_fa8b8a2a-0fc6-526a-b125-d86bec3d79c4.html">here for link</a> to full article. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>The notices went to 230 homeowners in North San Diego County, a 69 percent increase from February.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Wow, will there will be more SFR short sales or REOs in North SD County Coastal?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There were <strong>22</strong> new notices sent out in February, and <strong>23</strong> in March to SFR borrowers from Carlsbad to La Jolla &#8211; not quite a meltdown yet.  There are also some familiar faces on the lists as well, and we won&#8217;t count those as new meat.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are the lists:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/February-2010-Recon-NOTS-NSDCC.pdf">February 2010 Recon NOTS NSDCC</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/March-2010-Recon-NOTS-NSDCC.pdf">March 2010 Recon NOTS NSDCC</a></p>
<p>We could all use some more inventory &#8211; keep &#8216;em coming!</p>
<p>Added later, the chart from <a href="http://effectivedemand.blogspot.com">Effective Demand</a>, click on it twice for clarity:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/recontrust_nts_040910.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7558" title="recontrust_nts_040910" src="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/recontrust_nts_040910.jpg" alt="" width="577" height="421" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/14/recon-surge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distressed Inventory Count</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/12/distressed-inventory-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/12/distressed-inventory-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North County Coastal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow Inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring Kick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Selling?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=7514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re trying to gauge your chances of finding a seller who is distressed, here are the number of detached properties that have listed on the MLS as short sales (SS), bank-owneds (REO) or regular sellers (Reg.), plus the number of SFR trustee sales completed that either went back-to-bene (BTB) or were bought at the steps by a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">If you&#8217;re trying to gauge your chances of finding a seller who is distressed, here are the number of detached properties that have listed on the MLS as short sales (SS), bank-owneds (REO) or regular sellers (Reg.), plus the number of SFR trustee sales completed that either went back-to-bene (BTB) or were bought at the steps by a 3rd party &#8211; <b>since March 1st</b>:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><u>Town or Area</u></td>
<td><u>Zip Code</u></td>
<td><u>SS</u></td>
<td><u>REO</u></td>
<td><u>Reg.</u></td>
<td><u>BTB</u></td>
<td><u>3rd</u></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cardiff</td>
<td>92007</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carlsbad NW</td>
<td>92008</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>25</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carlsbad SE</td>
<td>92009</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>88</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carlsbad NE</td>
<td>92010</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carlsbad SW</td>
<td>92011</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>54</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Del Mar</td>
<td>92014</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Encinitas</td>
<td>92024</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>76</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>La Jolla</td>
<td>92037</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RSF</td>
<td>67+91</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Solana Bch</td>
<td>92075</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RB West</td>
<td>92127</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carmel Vly</td>
<td>92130</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>96</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#8216;10 Total</td>
<td>All</td>
<td><b>55</td>
<td><b>36</td>
<td><b>688</td>
<td><b>32</td>
<td><b>15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#8216;09 Total</td>
<td>All</td>
<td>44</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>747</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This year has seen a relatively big increase in short-sale and REO listings compared to 2009, but they&#8217;re still only 12% of the total listings that have been coming on the market recently in San Diego&#8217;s North County Coastal region.  With only 1-2 properties being sold at the trustee sales per day, there isn&#8217;t much to look forward to this summer.  The regular sellers won&#8217;t be feeling much pressure from distressed neighbors, and likely to hang around waiting&#8230;..for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/04/12/distressed-inventory-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Slinky Needed</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/26/more-slinky-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/26/more-slinky-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying at Trustee Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North County Coastal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REOs for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=6368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the new year bringing more REOs to market?
Though everyone wants to &#8220;steal one from the bank&#8221;, if you&#8217;re looking to buy in North SD County Coastal (Carlsbad-to-La Jolla), you&#8217;ll find few opportunities to snag an REO sale.
Have there been more REO listings coming on the market in 2010?


Detached
2010 REO listings
2010 Total listings
REO Percentage


All SD County
303
2,255
13.4%


NSDC Coastal
12
338
3.6%


No [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the new year bringing more REOs to market?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Though everyone wants to &#8220;steal one from the bank&#8221;, if you&#8217;re looking to buy in North SD County Coastal (Carlsbad-to-La Jolla), you&#8217;ll find few opportunities to snag an REO sale.</p>
<p>Have there been more REO listings coming on the market in 2010?</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><u>Detached</u></td>
<td><u>2010 REO listings</u></td>
<td><u>2010 Total listings</u></td>
<td><u>REO Percentage</u></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>All SD County</td>
<td><center><b>303</td>
<td><center>2,255</td>
<td><center><b>13.4%</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NSDC Coastal</td>
<td><center><b>12</td>
<td><center>338</td>
<td><center><b>3.6%</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>No flood yet.  What&#8217;s the difference in pricing?</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><u>Detached</u></td>
<td><u>2010 REO listings</u></td>
<td><u>2010 Total listings</u></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>All SD County</td>
<td><center><b>$199/sf</td>
<td><center>$296/sf</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NSDC Coastal</td>
<td><center><b>$311/sf</td>
<td><center>$515/sf</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Buyers see the REO listings, and dig the improved pricing &#8211; but there aren&#8217;t enough to go around.  We don&#8217;t necessarily need more REO inventory, just more REO-type pricing on regular listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/26/more-slinky-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expostulation?</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/19/expostulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/19/expostulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jim TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North County Coastal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Selling?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=6254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our old friend in La Costa Oaks keeps evolving.  Out of the 20 homes on the street, four have been foreclosed, and two sold short (one of those is still pending).  But on November 9th there was a sale of a 3,345sf house on the culdesac that was head-scratcher:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Our old friend in La Costa Oaks keeps evolving.  Out of the 20 homes on the street, four have been foreclosed, and two sold short (one of those is still pending).  But on November 9th there was a sale of a 3,345sf house on the culdesac that was head-scratcher:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fYiojfJIe5s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fYiojfJIe5s&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2010/01/19/expostulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosures Down</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/12/02/foreclosures-down-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/12/02/foreclosures-down-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures/REOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from sddt.com:
Notices of default and trustee deeds fell a combined 22 percent in November from October.
Data from the San Diego County Assessor showed trustee deeds &#8212; the last step in the foreclosure process &#8212; dipped 17 percent from October to 1,128. Year over year, trustee deeds are down 1 percent.
The number of NODs filed was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>from sddt.com:</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Notices of default and trustee deeds fell a combined 22 percent in November from October.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Data from the San Diego County Assessor showed trustee deeds &#8212; the last step in the foreclosure process &#8212; dipped 17 percent from October to 1,128. Year over year, trustee deeds are down 1 percent.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The number of NODs filed was down nearly 25 percent to 2,182 last month.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Despite the month-to-month drop, November nearly doubled the number of NODs filed in the same month last year when there was a foreclosure moratorium in place from mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The month-to-month dips can be attributed to some seasonal declines. On average, over the past five years, foreclosure filings have fallen 10 percent from October to November.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Year to date, there have been 4,189 fewer trustee’s deeds filed this year than 2008.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-5488"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Even with declining foreclosure numbers, the local foreclosure rate is historically high.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the first 11 months of 2009, there have been 13,988—that’s 20 percent more trustee’s deeds filed with the county than the annual totals of 2005, 2006 and 2007 combined.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The high number of foreclosures has led to increased activity in the housing market over the past year.  <strong>“I think we’re accepting a new normalcy around these market dynamics,”</strong> said Goldman.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">According to Foreclosure Radar, an online foreclosure tracking tool, homes sold at trustee’s sales in October were up more than five times what they were in October 2008.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The 339 homes sold at trustee’s sales last month made up one-fourth of the 1,356 trustee’s deeds filed with the county in October.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;These are bad times, but there are opportunites,&#8221; said Goldman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/12/02/foreclosures-down-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forever Dripped?</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/03/forever-dripped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/03/forever-dripped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From sddt:  &#8220;Even with NOD numbers virtually flat with 2,880 in October and 2,875 in September, 2009 is on pace to break 2008’s record-breaking 34,069 NODs filed in a single year.  With two more months to go, 2009 has racked up 33,904 NODs and has averaged 3,390 per month.&#8221;
According to foreclosureradar.com, about 25% of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">From sddt:  &#8220;Even with NOD numbers virtually flat with 2,880 in October and 2,875 in September, 2009 is on pace to break 2008’s record-breaking 34,069 NODs filed in a single year.  With two more months to go, <strong>2009 has racked up 33,904 NODs and has averaged 3,390 per month</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">According to foreclosureradar.com, about <strong>25%</strong> of the trustee sales in October were purchased by third parties on the courthouse steps.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There were 877 REO listings inputted onto the MLS last month.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Oct-09-chart2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4953" title="Oct 09 chart" src="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Oct-09-chart2.jpg" alt="Oct 09 chart" width="600" height="463" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/03/forever-dripped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Big Surge in REOs</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/29/no-big-surge-in-reos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/29/no-big-surge-in-reos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Buying?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking of Selling?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those on tsunami watch are having trouble staying awake, but after all the dripping it&#8217;s no surprise that the weekly totals of new REO listings coming onto the MLS in SD County are only slightly higher:



Week
# REOs
$$/sf


8/26-9/1
213
$172


9/2-8
172
$176


9/9-15
237
$177


9/16-22
181
$277


9/23-29
171
$178


9/30-10/6
189
$182


10/7-13
185
$183


10/14-20
202
$188


10/21-27
204
$187



While NAR has taken a lead role in supporting the tax credit extension, you have to believe the banking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Those on tsunami watch are having trouble staying awake, but after all the dripping it&#8217;s no surprise that the weekly totals of new REO listings coming onto the MLS in SD County are only slightly higher:</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Week</span></td>
<td><span style="text-decoration: underline;"># REOs</span></td>
<td><span style="text-decoration: underline;">$$/sf</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8/26-9/1</td>
<td><center>213</td>
<td>$172</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9/2-8</td>
<td><center>172</td>
<td>$176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9/9-15</td>
<td><center>237</td>
<td>$177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9/16-22</td>
<td><center>181</td>
<td>$277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9/23-29</td>
<td><center>171</td>
<td>$178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9/30-10/6</td>
<td><center>189</td>
<td>$182</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/7-13</td>
<td><center>185</td>
<td>$183</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/14-20</td>
<td><center>202</td>
<td>$188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/21-27</td>
<td><center>204</td>
<td>$187</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align: justify;">While NAR has taken a lead role in supporting the tax credit extension, you have to believe the banking lobby is pushing it hard too.  Don&#8217;t they have to be thinking that the next six months is a prime opportunity to dump a load of REOs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/29/no-big-surge-in-reos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest F/C Report</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/15/latest-fc-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/15/latest-fc-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure Count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures/REOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO Counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow Inventory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to Tom for sending this along.
Sean at foreclosureradar.com has published his latest report:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/CA_Foreclosure_Report/September+2009+CA+Foreclosure+Report.pdf
Excerpts:
With 90,365 properties in inventory, banks currently carry about 4.77 months of supply, however, it takes the banks on average 7.33 months to dispose of a bank owned home, thus current inventory is less than should be expected from normal operations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Hat tip to Tom for sending this along.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sean at foreclosureradar.com has published his latest report:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://s3.amazonaws.com/CA_Foreclosure_Report/September+2009+CA+Foreclosure+Report.pdf">https://s3.amazonaws.com/CA_Foreclosure_Report/September+2009+CA+Foreclosure+Report.pdf</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Excerpts:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">With 90,365 properties in inventory, banks currently carry about 4.77 months of supply, however, it takes the banks on average 7.33 months to dispose of a bank owned home, thus current inventory is less than should be expected from normal operations given current foreclosure volumes. <strong>Bottom line &#8211; there is no “shadow” inventory of bank owned homes being intentionally withheld from the market.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The number of properties on the brink of foreclosure continues to increase and has more than doubled from a year ago. With a smaller percentage of scheduled foreclosures actually being sold due to postponements at trustee sale, while at the same time seeing strong sales of bank owned (REO) properties, banks have managed to reduce their inventory by 41.8 percent from a year earlier. <strong>With the banks reselling an average of 18,943 homes a month in the 3rd quarter, and an average time to resell of 7 months</strong> (given the time taken for eviction, repairs and resale), <strong>we believe there is essentially NO shadow inventory of bank owned homes at this time.</strong> Moving forward there are more loans which are delinquent, in default, and scheduled for trustee sale than ever before, which would typically lead to a significant rise in foreclosure sales. We do not believe this increase is likely in the near future given the continued political pressure on banks not to foreclose.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Foreclosures continue to be sold at trustee sale at considerable discount to both the outstanding loan balance and the current estimated fair market value. As we saw in foreclosure outcomes, the lure of an average 20.5 percent discount to fair market value has dramatically increased the number of properties sold to 3rd party investors. At the same time it is very clear why more properties aren’t purchased at auction &#8211; with banks pricing the properties they end up taking back as REO an average 23 percent more than the current market value.</p>
<p>***********************************************</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here the weekly totals of new SD REO listings coming on the MLS &#8211; no real increases:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><u>Week</u>  </td>
<td><u># of REOs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sept 3-9</td>
<td><center>179</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sept 10-16</td>
<td><center>233</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sept 17-23</td>
<td><center>178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sept 24-30</td>
<td><center>168</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oct 1-7</td>
<td><center>186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oct 8-14</td>
<td><center><b>168</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Of those 1,116 REO listings, 717 have already been marked contingent, pending, or sold (64%).  The drip system is working great for the lenders!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the same time frame there have been 4,753 non-REO listings inputted, and 1,850 of those are contingent, pending, or sold (39%).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">REO listings make up 19% of the total new listings, but 28% of the contingents, pendings, and solds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/15/latest-fc-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
