Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
More Links

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home? Contact Jim the Realtor!

Carlsbad
(760) 434-5000

Carmel Valley
(858) 560-7700
jim@jimklinge.com


Category Archive: ‘Real Estate Investing’

Real Estate Crowdfunding

I don’t endorse this company but I like the idea:

Realty Mogul, a site where accredited investors can can pool their money to back real estate deals, is going live today.

Co-founder and Jilliene Helman argued that in the current financial landscape, real estate is “one of the ways that people can still get yields.” She also acknowledged that there’s a lot of excitement right now about equity crowdfunding for startups, but she noted that investments on Realty Mogul can start paying off in a few months (in the form of rent checks or loan payments), rather than five or ten years: “Our big focus for investors is cash flow.”

For now, Helman said Realty Mogul is “100 percent focused on accredited investors” (to qualify as an individual, you’d need to have a net worth of more than $1 million or income of more than $200,000). She also suggested that these kinds of investments could also be a good fit for the “mass affluent” — i.e., people making more than $100,000 a year who aren’t accredited investors — but the company is currently waiting for the final regulations to come out of the JOBS Act before it decides whether to actually open up to that group.

Realty Mogul was incubated by the Microsoft/TechStars Accelerator in Seattle, and it’s also announcing a $500,000 seed round (more on that in a second). Participating angel investors include Gust CEO David S. Rose, Gordon Stephenson (who’s on the board of directors at Zillow), and serial entrepreneur Sky Kruse.

Even though it’s officially launching today, Realty Mogul already funded its first project — AH Capital used the site to raise $110,000 to purchase and rehabilitate a duplex in Los Angeles.

When you join the site, you can browse a marketplace of different investments, then sign the paperwork and submit the payment for deals that you’re interested in. The investment only happens if the total funding goal is reached. If it is, you can then track your investments in an investor dashboard.

dashboard-demo

Helman said that one of her big goals is to build investor trust. For example, Realty Mogul links to all of the real estate companies’ LinkedIn profiles, so users can see whether they’re connected to the company in some way. For now, the site is limited to properties in Washington and California, although investors can participate in anywhere. Helman said she plans to expand gradually.

“We are a tech startup, and tech startups are supposed to grow as quickly as humanly possible,” Helman said. “But we’re a financial services company first and a tech startup second, so I want to grow as quickly but as conservatively as possible. We need to make sure we’re keeping investor protections first.”

Other sites for real estate crowdfunding include Fundrise and Prodigy Network.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/20/realty-mogul-launch/

Posted by on Mar 20, 2013 in Real Estate Investing | 6 comments

More Highlands

This is right down the street from the flipper who made $850,000 gross profit when he sold his duplex for $1,825,000 cash, so others nearby figure that it means something, and are hoping to get in on the action.

This doesn’t really pencil as an investment property, unless you really worked the vacation rentals, plus got some benefit from using it yourself?

Or buy it for your kids?

Posted by on Feb 13, 2013 in Bubbleinfo TV, Encinitas, Real Estate Investing | 2 comments

“My Wife Wants Them”

Shiller is asked in the video how many houses he owns (two) and why – his answer – “My wife wants them”. (at the 7:50-min mark)

Robert Shiller, the Yale  economist who nailed the housing bubble before it burst, was on Bloomberg  Television with Trish Regan and Adam Johnson on Wednesday afternoon to  discuss the U.S. housing market.

As usual, Shiller was reluctant to declare that home prices had  bottomed.  He explained that the  housing market is a speculative one  and that there’s no telling, which way prices would go tomorrow.  He also  explained that there wasn’t much reason to believe that home prices would  appreciate back to levels seen during the last cycle.

Regan followed up with a question that got Shiller perked up.

“Then why buy a home?” she asked.  “People trap their savings in a  home.  They’re running an opportunity cost of not having that money liquid  to earn a better return in the market.  Why do it?”

“Absolutely!” Shiller exclaimed.  “Housing traditionally is not viewed  as a great investment.  It takes maintenance, it depreciates, it goes out  of style.  All of those are problems. And there’s technical progress in  housing.  So, new ones are better.”

These were some of the issues Shiller addressed in his classic book, Irrational  Exuberance.

He continued.

“So, why was it considered an investment?  That was a fad.  That  was an idea that took hold in the early 2000′s.  And I don’t expect it to  come back.  Not with the same force.  So people might just decide,  “Yeah, I’ll diversify my portfolio.  I’ll live in a rental.”  That is  a very sensible thing for many people to do.”

Adam Johnson also noted that this was in line with Shiller’s assessment that  real U.S. home price appreciation from 1890 to 1990 was just about 0  percent.  This is explained by the falling costs of construction and  labor.

For people who can’t wrap there heads around this, Shiller offers an  analogy.

“If you think investing in housing is such a great idea, why not invest in cars?” he asked.  “Buy a car, mothball it, and sell it in 20 years.   Obviously not a good idea because people won’t want our cars.  It’s the  same with our houses.  So, they’re not really an investment vehicle.”

Any homeowner knows that you can’t sell a home with 30-year-old roofing,  carpet, and kitchen appliances.  Sure, the home price might go up, but you  have to adjust for years of maintenance and renovations.

Read more:  http://www.businessinsider.com/robert-shiller-home-investment-a-fad-2013-2#ixzz2KEVPbaDg

Posted by on Feb 7, 2013 in Market Conditions, Real Estate Investing, Same-House Sales | 8 comments

Crowdfunding for Real Estate

From the pyramids to the Empire State Building, the world’s largest structures have typically been financed by the superrich. New York-based Prodigy Network, best known for marketing the Trump SoHo hotel condominium, is now trying a different model: It’s bringing crowdfunding to real estate, soliciting thousands of investors to buy slices of a skyscraper in exchange for a share of rents and property appreciation. “The big difference from traditional real estate is that instead of buying into a fund with a pool of assets, people invest in a single asset,” says Rodrigo Niño, Prodigy’s founder and chief executive officer. “It lets them control the risk.”

skyscraperProdigy has wanted to try crowdfunding almost since its founding seven years ago but didn’t get a chance until it stumbled on the derecho fiducario, a little-known financial instrument in Niño’s native Colombia that allows individual investment in isolated real estate projects. In Colombia, Prodigy has crowdfunded a building called BD Bacatá that will be the nation’s tallest. About 3,100 investors kicked in $171.8 million (COP308 billion) of the $239 million needed to build the 66-story skyscraper in downtown Bogotá. Investors can also buy and sell shares through a resale program, which functions like a secondary market.

Prodigy is currently under contract to buy 84 William Street in downtown Manhattan for $58 million. It plans to invest an additional $32 million. Prodigy says it intends to raise some $26 million in equity from individual investors in 11 countries. FTI Consulting, based in West Palm Beach, Fla., will ensure that Prodigy complies with the U.S. tax code, as well as anti-money-laundering laws, when accepting money from outside the country. “Instead of buying crappy condos in South Florida, this allows international investors to invest in real markets like New York and in assets that actually make sense,” says Niño, who was raised in Colombia and studied economics in Switzerland. Prodigy says William Street investors will see returns of 15 percent, compared with 21 percent for investors in BD Bacatá.

The company’s investors don’t yet include Americans because the U.S. allows only accredited investors—generally those who have assets of more than $1 million—to buy equity in private firms. That will soon change: The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, signed into law last April, allows anyone to invest as much as $2,000 or 5 percent of their income or net worth, whichever is greater, in closely held ventures. The Securities and Exchange Commission is still working on rules for investor safeguards required by the act.

SEC guarantees may not be enough for leery U.S. investors, says Dan Fasulo, a managing director at Real Capital Analytics. “It’s hard enough to develop a property down the block,” Fasulo says. “How are you going to do it sitting 3,000 miles away?”

Gustavo Gonzalez, a Colombian civil engineer who bought two shares of BD Bacatá in 2010 for 101 million pesos ($57,178), says the returns speak for themselves. Since his purchase, based on an advertisement he read in a local newspaper, the shares have appreciated by about 43 percent. “I like the idea that this is going to be the highest building in the country,” he says. Just as important, “I thought it was going to go up a lot, and that’s what happened.”

The bottom line: Once the SEC finalizes its safeguards, ordinary American investors will be able to buy a slice of individual properties.

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-01-24/crowdfunding-for-real-estate-buy-a-slice-of-a-skyscraper

Posted by on Jan 24, 2013 in Real Estate Investing, Thinking of Buying? | 2 comments

Maverick Bruce

Bruce_NorrisMost experts predict a modest price recovery in the Southern California housing market during 2013.

Not Bruce Norris.  The Inland Empire investor says get ready for a 20 percent price spike by this time next year.

It’s a bold prediction, but worth listening to because the principal and founder of the Norris Group in Riverside foresaw the housing bubble burst a year before it happened. And he backed up the call by selling off much of his property just before the crash.

“My best guess is that California will have significant price inflation,” Norris said. “Prices could escalate so strongly that we will think we are in 2004 instead of 2013,” Norris said.

Not everyone sees things the same way. Many economists and housing experts are looking at flat to modest growth in prices for 2013. Gary Painter, director of research at the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, thinks at most the Los Angeles area will see about a 3 percent increase. The California Association of Realtors has predicted an increase of about 5.7 percent.

“Well, I disagree with (Norris),” said Michael Carney, executive director of the Real Estate Research Council at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.

“My forecast is that we’re not going to see a whole lot of change in home prices for a long time, and the reason is I don’t see the financing coming back. The financing (for the market boom) was coming from worldwide sales of mortgage-backed securities and that clearly came to an end in 2007.”

“There will almost be no change in prices until 2030, a generation,” Carney added.

Carney has had that discussion directly with Norris, who sits on the council’s board.

“Maybe I’ll be wrong,” Carney admits. “I keep reminding people that the truth is uncertain, but Bruce has a better track record at predicting prices than I have.”

Read More

Posted by on Jan 13, 2013 in Forecasts, Real Estate Investing, Thinking of Buying?, Thinking of Selling? | 10 comments

Disclosing Foreclosure to Tenants

As of Jan. 1, property managers and landlords in California are required to disclose in writing to any prospective tenants if a notice of default has been recorded against the property. The law applies to rentals of single-family homes and apartment buildings of no more than four units.

The disclosure also includes a notice that if a new owner takes ownership of a property following foreclosure, the owner will not be able to evict the tenants for at least 90 days written eviction notices in many cases.

Supporters of the new bill say that that such a disclosure is critical for tenants in making an informed decision about where to live. Opponents, however, argued that such disclosures could worsen the financial conditions of the landlord and even hasten foreclosure.

For landlords who violate the disclosure requirement, tenants may be able to void any lease and recover one month’s rent or twice the actual damages — whichever is greater. Tenants may also be able to recover all prepaid rent from the landlord if the landlord violates the disclosure requirement, according to the new law.

http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2013/01/03/new-calif-law-requires-disclosure-foreclosure-tenants

Posted by on Jan 5, 2013 in Local Government, Real Estate Investing | 3 comments

Real Estate and IRAs

http://fortunewallstreet.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/real-estate-ira.jpgWith the housing market showing signs of stabilizing, investors are turning back to real estate. And an increasing number of affluent savers have been using their retirement accounts to purchase homes, rental apartments, and other properties. Done properly, such a strategy can generate good income with modest volatility.

But before you dive in, take heed: It’s a time-consuming proposition, and you’ll need to proceed carefully not just to avoid investment losses but also to stay clear of some nasty tax pitfalls.

To buy real estate within a retirement account, you first need to set up a “self-directed” IRA with a custodian. Once you’ve established the IRA, you can then use it to purchase practically any type of real estate, including vacant land, single- and multi-family homes, commercial properties, co-ops, and condos. But you’ll also have to adhere to a slew of IRS regulations.

For starters, “you can’t use real estate in a self-directed IRA for your personal benefit,” says Richard Price, a CPA with Houston-based Cornelius Stegent & Price. If you do, the IRS could disqualify the IRA, in which case you’d owe ordinary income taxes on the entire value of the property, plus a 10% penalty.

For instance, you could buy a Miami condo and rent it to third parties, but you couldn’t stay even one night there yourself. Nor could you rent it out or grant free use of it to most close relatives. You couldn’t renovate or actively manage the property yourself. You’re also prohibited from buying real estate for the IRA that you or selected family members already own.

To prevent the IRA from being disqualified, all income generated by the real estate must be paid directly into the IRA and remain there until you retire. If you sell the property, all proceeds must likewise stay in the IRA. Expenses, such as property taxes, insurance, and improvements, must come straight from the IRA; you can’t use personal funds to pay for them, and you can’t deduct them for tax purposes. You’ll therefore need to leave enough cash inside the IRA to keep the property running (for 2013, you can contribute up to $5,500 to your self-directed IRA, or $6,500 if you’re age 50 or older).

If you sell real estate within a regular self-directed IRA, any appreciation on the property will ultimately get taxed as ordinary income when you take withdrawals, at rates currently up to 35%.

But if you set up a self-directed Roth IRA (in which your contributions are made with after-tax dollars), all your property gains and withdrawals will be tax-free. That’s assuming, of course, that you have gains. There’s no guarantee that the real estate market won’t tank again. And rising property taxes, unplanned maintenance costs, and deadbeat tenants could also ding your returns.

The upside of real estate is big — but so are the headaches.

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2012/12/18/ira-real-estate/

Posted by on Dec 18, 2012 in Real Estate Investing, Thinking of Buying? | 1 comment

Love Ed’s Quote

An excellent thought regarding the increase in pricing:

The run-up in prices caught the attention of Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research in Washington, who regarded the trend as “serious grounds for concern that these markets are being driven by speculation.”

“While some speculators buying up homes at a bottom can be positive, the sort of price rises that you are seeing there may be excessive,” Baker said in an email to The Times.

He noted that a big factor in the rising median price is increased sales of high-end homes, which skew the results to the upside. Indexes that track specific home resales, such as Case-Shiller, show far lower price appreciation.

Still, Baker said he thought the California market could experience “serious gyrations” because of the heavy purchases by investors hoping to sooner or later flip the homes at a profit.

“The speculators likely have pushed prices above where the market would put them in some markets,” he said.

Ed Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast of the economy, had a more sanguine take on the trend than Baker.

“I am inclined to think that what he calls speculators know more about the market than he does,” Leamer said. “It’s a good thing for professionals to be putting a floor under home prices.”

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-california-home-sales-20121213,0,5057854.story

Posted by on Dec 14, 2012 in Market Conditions, Real Estate Investing | 2 comments

“Significant Price Inflation”

Hat tip to Kingside for sending this along:

Remember the days when residential real estate gained equity each year?  It’s happening again in California, and a year from now homeowners could see as much as a 20 percent increase in the median price of homes across the state, according to Bruce Norris, a Riverside-based real estate analyst and principal of The Norris Group.

“My best guess is that California we will have significant price inflation. Prices could escalate so strongly that we will think we are in 2004 instead of 2013.”

Some may ask how this is possible.  But Norris has experience predicting the unpredictable.

A real estate consultant, investor and educator for the past 30 years, Norris publicly predicted the current sub-prime lending and foreclosure crisis in January of 2006, more than a year before the nation’s leading economists and real estate industry analysts would even acknowledge the possibility of a downturn. Norris also correctly forecast both the real estate boom that began in 1997 and the subsequent doubling of home prices.

Norris now says he has identified three reasons why median home prices in California will go up.

For starters, he said, policy decisions have resulted in record low inventory levels.

“In many areas,” Norris said, “there’s one month of inventory. Inside of that one month of inventory are very few REOs and a lot of short sales that may or may not really be available to buy and close anytime soon. The properties that would normally be purchased by owner occupants are being snapped up by billion dollar hedge funds. These hedge funds, unlike the smaller investor types, are keeping all of the properties as rentals. There’s a little inventory for sale by ‘normal sellers with equity,’ but, right on cue they are getting the idea their property just might be worth more than the last sale.”

With the absence of inventory, Norris predicts, prices will escalate.

A second factor paving the way for the rise in median home prices in California is the return of the former homeowner who was foreclosed on in 2008 and 2009.

“The numbers of trustee sales in those years were staggering,” Norris said, adding, “As a percentage of whatever had happened in the past, 2008 and 2009 will go down in history as the California Real Estate Collapse of all time. The numbers differ across the state but the percentages are similar. In San Bernardino, the numbers of foreclosures exceeded the number of sales in 2008 and 2009. Fast forward to 2012 and you now have those same people ready and capable of buying a home again.”

So, how is it these people can buy homes so soon after going through a foreclosure? The answer, Norris says, resides with FHA, which will now make a loan to a buyer who lost their home via foreclosure after three years. “Buyers have realized that their house payment would be less than their rent, and that’s fueling demand and pushing up home prices,” he said.

The third factor setting the stage for a significant increase in median home prices is interest rates. “Interest rates are at all-time lows, and that allows for price increases to take place without significantly increasing mortgage payments,” Norris said, adding that he expects California’s median prices to up by as much as 20 percent during the coming year.

http://www.thenorrisgroup.com/blog/news/real-estate-analyst-predicts-a-20-percent-increase-in-median-home-prices-in-california-during-the-next-year/

Posted by on Dec 12, 2012 in Bottom Talk, Bubble-Era Pricing, Market Conditions, Real Estate Investing, Thinking of Buying?, Thinking of Selling?, Tips, Advice & Links | 16 comments