Klinge Realty
More Links

Are you looking for an experienced agent to help you buy or sell a home? Contact Jim the Realtor!

Jim Klinge
Cell/Text: (858) 997-3801
701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92011

Posted by on Sep 14, 2012 in Bailout | 6 comments | Print Print

QE3 Impact on Housing?

In January, 2009 the Fed didn’t hold any mortgage-backed securities.

Today they have $843 billion, and yesterday they “agreed to increase policy accommodation by purchasing additional agency  mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month. The Committee also will continue through the end of the year its program to  extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in June,  and it is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from  its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency  mortgage-backed securities.”

 “These actions, which together will increase the  Committee’s holdings of longer-term securities by about $85 billion each month through the end of the year, should put downward pressure on longer-term  interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.”

(seen at CR, HT josap)

Will the Fed’s buying more MBS make a difference in housing?

Everybody I know was happy at the thought of getting a 3.875% rate.  Freddie Mac’s 30-year rate was 3.55% this week.  If the Fed’s actions push them lower, what is the effect on monthly payments?

They are only buying agency paper, so let’s look at the conforming $417,000 loan amount:

$417,000 @ 3.55% = $1,884.17

$417,000 @ 3.00% = $1,758.09

If 30-year conforming rates got all the way down to 3.00%, buyers would either save $126/mo., or be able to afford a $30,000 higher mortgage and pay the same $1,884.

But JimG nailed it – this MBS buying spree will allow banks to offload stinky paper to the Fed, rather than foreclosing.  Banks can predict when a mortgage is going bad – because borrowers people typically slow-pay before defaulting.  Servicers would be able to dump any suspected about-to-default mortgages, and keep the short-sale desk open for the borrowers who want to cooperate over the next few years.

The Fed would probably be more accomodating of the folks who don’t pay, so defaulters would enjoy an extended free-rent period.  Foreclosures will dry up further (causing banks to appear solvent), the real-estate market will have fewer distressed sales giving people the idea that prices will improve soon, and the Fed will look like a hero.

In the meantime, we’ll have tight inventory and more OPTs.


  1. Exactly how I see things moving as well.

    Very good/clear write up


  2. So far so good. Treasury yields are sky rocketing. How long will it take to show up in the mortgage rates and how much do mortgage rates need to go up until the potential buyers panic and over pay. Could be a good winter for sellers.


  3. Ya great breakdown. Despite what the pols and fed “should” do, it doesn’t take an abundance of situational awareness to see what they “are” doing. Equities to flip, hard assets to hold.


  4. How much is this going to cost us in the end?


  5. gosh, the generation that thought they were being responsible by not participating in the ill-fated housing boom and waiting to buy… we’re just getting crushed. Paying high rents during the boom + trying to save up cash for a downpayment = completely getting left behind financially.

    Yet if we’d bought in 2005 we’d be underwater or short sale bait.

    The lost decade is turning into the lost decade and a half… will we ever see the prosperity of the Reagan-Bush1-Clinton years again?


  6. I have a good number of rental properties generating a modest ROI but I am in the process of selling them in order to invest in a primary piece of property before prices take off further. Is this correct thinking now that the Fed said they will step in and the market will not be given a chance to re-correct which would have put downward pressure on prices?