<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam Rappoport 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s guide to North San Diego County Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:47:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flip This Lawsuit &#187; Adam Rappoport</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25965</link>
		<dc:creator>Flip This Lawsuit &#187; Adam Rappoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25965</guid>
		<description>[...] The Realtor has a three part series of interviews with flipper Adam Rappoport (known online as &#8220;SD Realtor&#8220;).  He [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Realtor has a three part series of interviews with flipper Adam Rappoport (known online as &#8220;SD Realtor&#8220;).  He [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25930</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25930</guid>
		<description>Cara the taxes are such a killer it is ridiculous. 

This business is no different then any other small business. Your losses are your losses are your losses but they only apply to each year they occur in. These sales cannot be treated like capital gains. They dont qualify as 1031 exchanges. Yes the logic of moving our current escrows to close after Jan 1 is due to the income we have already made this year. 

As for the reasons I am doing it, it is because I see it as an opportunity. Is it risky? Yes but I don&#039;t view it to be nearly as risky as someone on the outside. The other two investors are electrical engineers as I am as well. My income from real estate transactions this year, (not from my flipping) is very good as well. As I said at the very beginning, what was hard for ME to stomach was to have a couple hundred thousand sitting in a 2% cd. So after taxes I was making what... a little over 1%? I knew with hard work and diligence I could at least minimize the risk, and participate in a market that while manipulated at least I understood the manipulation. I could have dumped the money into the stock market and done great but I don&#039;t have control over that market. 

So the risk premium while not pallatable, (or advised) for most people was for me. I will repeat, I do not advise anyone else to try this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cara the taxes are such a killer it is ridiculous. </p>
<p>This business is no different then any other small business. Your losses are your losses are your losses but they only apply to each year they occur in. These sales cannot be treated like capital gains. They dont qualify as 1031 exchanges. Yes the logic of moving our current escrows to close after Jan 1 is due to the income we have already made this year. </p>
<p>As for the reasons I am doing it, it is because I see it as an opportunity. Is it risky? Yes but I don&#8217;t view it to be nearly as risky as someone on the outside. The other two investors are electrical engineers as I am as well. My income from real estate transactions this year, (not from my flipping) is very good as well. As I said at the very beginning, what was hard for ME to stomach was to have a couple hundred thousand sitting in a 2% cd. So after taxes I was making what&#8230; a little over 1%? I knew with hard work and diligence I could at least minimize the risk, and participate in a market that while manipulated at least I understood the manipulation. I could have dumped the money into the stock market and done great but I don&#8217;t have control over that market. </p>
<p>So the risk premium while not pallatable, (or advised) for most people was for me. I will repeat, I do not advise anyone else to try this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cara</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25865</link>
		<dc:creator>cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25865</guid>
		<description>I have neither the money nor the stomach for this, so, no. 

The taxes are a killer. That 40k isn&#039;t 40k it&#039;s 70% of 40k or whatever your bracket determines. 

At least if you were playing black jack then all your gains and losses would be in a short timeframe such that you just have the net gain to pay taxes on...

Can you even apply your future losses to your current gains? Is that the logic of moving the closes to after Jan 1st? Such that when the music stops it will be in the same year as as many of the gains as possible?

Yikes. The only motivation I can see for putting in this much effort for such a risky venture is (a) because the big boys are making money at it, and you want in. (b) the transaction numbers are so few in SD that you aren&#039;t making enough as a regular Realtor right now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have neither the money nor the stomach for this, so, no. </p>
<p>The taxes are a killer. That 40k isn&#8217;t 40k it&#8217;s 70% of 40k or whatever your bracket determines. </p>
<p>At least if you were playing black jack then all your gains and losses would be in a short timeframe such that you just have the net gain to pay taxes on&#8230;</p>
<p>Can you even apply your future losses to your current gains? Is that the logic of moving the closes to after Jan 1st? Such that when the music stops it will be in the same year as as many of the gains as possible?</p>
<p>Yikes. The only motivation I can see for putting in this much effort for such a risky venture is (a) because the big boys are making money at it, and you want in. (b) the transaction numbers are so few in SD that you aren&#8217;t making enough as a regular Realtor right now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25792</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25792</guid>
		<description>Sorry if I didnt answer your question directly. The corp doesn&#039;t do much taxwise, it is simply a liability protection purposes. We are paying for taxes at both state and federal levels. Equity is not taxed but profits are. So think of it this way. You invest 100k to buy a home. You make 140k on it. Even if you invest the 40k back into another home, you pay taxes on that 40k this year. It is not at all like 1031 exchanging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I didnt answer your question directly. The corp doesn&#8217;t do much taxwise, it is simply a liability protection purposes. We are paying for taxes at both state and federal levels. Equity is not taxed but profits are. So think of it this way. You invest 100k to buy a home. You make 140k on it. Even if you invest the 40k back into another home, you pay taxes on that 40k this year. It is not at all like 1031 exchanging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25791</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25791</guid>
		<description>Jim don&#039;t confuse equity with profits. We are getting absolutely hammered on taxes. Here is the worst case scenario, all of the net profits we make are taxed at full income. Our biz is structured as a corp. The corp will pay each of us as employees. Now yes we can defer some of the taxes using a SEP but that is it man. We can also issue dividends rather then pay salaries but you have to watch out for that. You go to far and you get screwed. So even though each investor is reinvesting profit back into the company to increase equity shares, each investor still is getting pounded hard. Normal income man. Both the corp and investor are paying normal employment taxes as well. 

Can we play it more aggressively? Yes we can however I am not a fan of messing with the IRS and have more to lose then gain. So that will cost me a few more thousand in taxes. Not good. I am not a tax expert, we use an accountant who is very risk averse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim don&#8217;t confuse equity with profits. We are getting absolutely hammered on taxes. Here is the worst case scenario, all of the net profits we make are taxed at full income. Our biz is structured as a corp. The corp will pay each of us as employees. Now yes we can defer some of the taxes using a SEP but that is it man. We can also issue dividends rather then pay salaries but you have to watch out for that. You go to far and you get screwed. So even though each investor is reinvesting profit back into the company to increase equity shares, each investor still is getting pounded hard. Normal income man. Both the corp and investor are paying normal employment taxes as well. </p>
<p>Can we play it more aggressively? Yes we can however I am not a fan of messing with the IRS and have more to lose then gain. So that will cost me a few more thousand in taxes. Not good. I am not a tax expert, we use an accountant who is very risk averse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim the Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25772</guid>
		<description>SD - what about capital-gains tax?  

You are rolling the equity from closings into other properties, and deferring the capital-gains tax.

But once the music stops, you&#039;ll end up owing fed and state tax on the net profit on every deal.  Does having an LLC help greatly, or just a minor benefit in reducing income taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SD &#8211; what about capital-gains tax?  </p>
<p>You are rolling the equity from closings into other properties, and deferring the capital-gains tax.</p>
<p>But once the music stops, you&#8217;ll end up owing fed and state tax on the net profit on every deal.  Does having an LLC help greatly, or just a minor benefit in reducing income taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25771</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25771</guid>
		<description>Cara are you sure you are not doing this as well? No need to comment on strategy because you called it exactly. 

The overlapping is random and is simply based on liquidity we have. Right now we are full or RE and have a little cash if we wanted to buy a cheap condo... which we are trying to. Although 2 of the homes are in escrow, one is past the contingency period and one has not. One home got listed today and one will be in another 2 weeks. Right now we are actually trying to push escrow closings to after Jan 1. 

The question you asked is one I would pay for an answer to. I could not tell you how fast the market can roll over but I think within 2-3 months in the case of something rather cataclysmic. As you would agree what we are doing is terribly risking and not recommended at all. We have been lucky and I only wish we started at the end of 08 instead of the middle of 09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cara are you sure you are not doing this as well? No need to comment on strategy because you called it exactly. </p>
<p>The overlapping is random and is simply based on liquidity we have. Right now we are full or RE and have a little cash if we wanted to buy a cheap condo&#8230; which we are trying to. Although 2 of the homes are in escrow, one is past the contingency period and one has not. One home got listed today and one will be in another 2 weeks. Right now we are actually trying to push escrow closings to after Jan 1. </p>
<p>The question you asked is one I would pay for an answer to. I could not tell you how fast the market can roll over but I think within 2-3 months in the case of something rather cataclysmic. As you would agree what we are doing is terribly risking and not recommended at all. We have been lucky and I only wish we started at the end of 08 instead of the middle of 09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cara</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25762</link>
		<dc:creator>cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25762</guid>
		<description>Definitely the short hold time is key to surviving at this on a small-timer basis. What you&#039;re trying to do is essentially arbitrage but with added lien/liability risks on an illiquid asset. So, to minimize the non-liquidity you are smartly listening to the market when it speaks (or stays silent) and rapidly adjusting your price. 

How overlapping are your properties? How much cash are you leaving out there at any given time? That&#039;s got to be the key decision. That and how long this arbitrage opportunity lasts is going to determine whether you end up making or losing money overall. Though I assume you have a baseline scenario in your head for just how fast you think the market could fall in a worst case scenario, and that&#039;s probably not as bad as getting a house that has $50k+ of issues that take time to repair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the short hold time is key to surviving at this on a small-timer basis. What you&#8217;re trying to do is essentially arbitrage but with added lien/liability risks on an illiquid asset. So, to minimize the non-liquidity you are smartly listening to the market when it speaks (or stays silent) and rapidly adjusting your price. </p>
<p>How overlapping are your properties? How much cash are you leaving out there at any given time? That&#8217;s got to be the key decision. That and how long this arbitrage opportunity lasts is going to determine whether you end up making or losing money overall. Though I assume you have a baseline scenario in your head for just how fast you think the market could fall in a worst case scenario, and that&#8217;s probably not as bad as getting a house that has $50k+ of issues that take time to repair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SD Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25759</link>
		<dc:creator>SD Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25759</guid>
		<description>Cara and Mike yes the exit strategy is nerve racking. I keep a very close eye not on the courthouse as much as the market itself. As we know the market is so heavily manipulated right now, what should be happening and what is happening are two different things. 

The 600k to earn 45k is not what was planned. Also we have 3 closings under our belt so we are playing with SOME house money. Jim featured just 1 of our homes and recall we have 7 of them. In fact that 45k is a perfect illustration of our strategy. Actually when we close it will be about 55k. So we had a higher profit margin targetted but after a very short time on the market with no acceptable offers we slashed the price by 30k to be consistent. Our goal is to NOT get caught with property and to stay liquid. So if we don&#039;t get what we want quick we cut and run. 

So yes on the outside looking in a 600k investment to make 45 or 55k is an idiots game, but if you look at the whole story it makes more sense then holding a depreciating asset hoping for someone to come in and then getting killed right? 

As I said, we are not expert at this but I do feel like we are adhering to a strategy that will help us avoid getting hammered. It is absolutely inevitable that we will be holding properties when the bottom does fall out but we are trying to minimize the probability and reduce the fallout when it does happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cara and Mike yes the exit strategy is nerve racking. I keep a very close eye not on the courthouse as much as the market itself. As we know the market is so heavily manipulated right now, what should be happening and what is happening are two different things. </p>
<p>The 600k to earn 45k is not what was planned. Also we have 3 closings under our belt so we are playing with SOME house money. Jim featured just 1 of our homes and recall we have 7 of them. In fact that 45k is a perfect illustration of our strategy. Actually when we close it will be about 55k. So we had a higher profit margin targetted but after a very short time on the market with no acceptable offers we slashed the price by 30k to be consistent. Our goal is to NOT get caught with property and to stay liquid. So if we don&#8217;t get what we want quick we cut and run. </p>
<p>So yes on the outside looking in a 600k investment to make 45 or 55k is an idiots game, but if you look at the whole story it makes more sense then holding a depreciating asset hoping for someone to come in and then getting killed right? </p>
<p>As I said, we are not expert at this but I do feel like we are adhering to a strategy that will help us avoid getting hammered. It is absolutely inevitable that we will be holding properties when the bottom does fall out but we are trying to minimize the probability and reduce the fallout when it does happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cara</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/11/25/adam-rappoport-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25749</link>
		<dc:creator>cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=5373#comment-25749</guid>
		<description>The planning on the exit strategy has got to be rough. As more homes hit the courthouse steps, prices paid by flippers &quot;should&quot; be less, right? But you&#039;re worried that the greater inventory could leave you holding the bag (or taking under purchase price).

It really does seem like a gamble, of when do you say when? After the first time margins go under 5%? After the first time you get unlucky on deferred maintanence needs?

More power to you. $600k seems like an awful lot of money to put on the line just to clear $60k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The planning on the exit strategy has got to be rough. As more homes hit the courthouse steps, prices paid by flippers &#8220;should&#8221; be less, right? But you&#8217;re worried that the greater inventory could leave you holding the bag (or taking under purchase price).</p>
<p>It really does seem like a gamble, of when do you say when? After the first time margins go under 5%? After the first time you get unlucky on deferred maintanence needs?</p>
<p>More power to you. $600k seems like an awful lot of money to put on the line just to clear $60k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
