<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreclosures Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s guide to North San Diego County Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Price A House Low And It Will Go - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22913</link>
		<dc:creator>Price A House Low And It Will Go - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22913</guid>
		<description>[...] greenbacks at auction. San Diego County Buyers are so eager that even blackhearted Jim has been  called out for being too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] greenbacks at auction. San Diego County Buyers are so eager that even blackhearted Jim has been  called out for being too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimG</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22541</link>
		<dc:creator>JimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22541</guid>
		<description>The end result of CV will be interesting to say the least. RSF has loads of inventory and prices are coming down fast,will some relocate to CV, probably a few. Then you look at the price drops for RPQ, Scripps Ranch and Carlsbad and wonder how CV can stay in it&#039;s own little protected bubble, I don&#039;t think it can. Lots of condos selling as REOs and more on the way. Just a matter of time before the SFR show up, or they could all just end up as short sales first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end result of CV will be interesting to say the least. RSF has loads of inventory and prices are coming down fast,will some relocate to CV, probably a few. Then you look at the price drops for RPQ, Scripps Ranch and Carlsbad and wonder how CV can stay in it&#8217;s own little protected bubble, I don&#8217;t think it can. Lots of condos selling as REOs and more on the way. Just a matter of time before the SFR show up, or they could all just end up as short sales first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ucgal</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22535</link>
		<dc:creator>ucgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 04:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22535</guid>
		<description>NODs may be down - but I think JimG is right... banks aren&#039;t filing them even though loans are delinquent.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aXZinRhF5tlA
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Banks With 20% Unpaid Loans at 18-Year High Amid Recovery Doubt &lt;/b&gt;
Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) -- The number of U.S. lenders that can’t collect on at least 20 percent of their loans hit an 18-year high, signaling that more bank failures and losses could slow an economic recovery.
...&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m convinced there are a lot of delinquent loans out there that are not getting NODs.  Perhaps the banks/servicers can&#039;t handle the volume.  Perhaps the banks/mortgage owners don&#039;t want to mark the loss.  For whatever reason the NODs aren&#039;t lining up with the delinquencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NODs may be down &#8211; but I think JimG is right&#8230; banks aren&#8217;t filing them even though loans are delinquent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aXZinRhF5tlA" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aXZinRhF5tlA</a><br />
<i><b>Banks With 20% Unpaid Loans at 18-Year High Amid Recovery Doubt </b><br />
Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The number of U.S. lenders that can’t collect on at least 20 percent of their loans hit an 18-year high, signaling that more bank failures and losses could slow an economic recovery.<br />
&#8230;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced there are a lot of delinquent loans out there that are not getting NODs.  Perhaps the banks/servicers can&#8217;t handle the volume.  Perhaps the banks/mortgage owners don&#8217;t want to mark the loss.  For whatever reason the NODs aren&#8217;t lining up with the delinquencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald McMansion</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22523</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald McMansion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22523</guid>
		<description>JtR,

I forgot to mention this, but the only reason for my anonymity is to help protect myself from the phishers and scammers that are out there.  It&#039;s not that I&#039;m intentionally trying to hide something from you.  I&#039;m just trying to be prudent.

I&#039;m also a little hurt that you said you&#039;d hope to never meet me.  Again, I have not intended to become your adversary.  I&#039;m just hoping to add to the discussion on a blog that seemed to have a fair amount of knowledgeable and open-minded individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JtR,</p>
<p>I forgot to mention this, but the only reason for my anonymity is to help protect myself from the phishers and scammers that are out there.  It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m intentionally trying to hide something from you.  I&#8217;m just trying to be prudent.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also a little hurt that you said you&#8217;d hope to never meet me.  Again, I have not intended to become your adversary.  I&#8217;m just hoping to add to the discussion on a blog that seemed to have a fair amount of knowledgeable and open-minded individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald McMansion</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22522</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald McMansion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22522</guid>
		<description>JtR,

If it&#039;s your request that I stay away from your blog, just ask.  I&#039;m not a realtor, and I have no beef with you or the information that you provide.  I find it all very enlightening, your data and stories as well as the feedback from your followers.

If my posts come as an attempt to contradict your views or put you down, that&#039;s not my intention.  I&#039;m seeing things from a different perspective and trying to express my views and feelings in order to gain feedback from you and others that follow you.

Ross&#039; statement from &#039;The Millionair Next Door&#039; is from a very different era, and this points to the core of my feelings on this subject.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a fair comparison to single out the people studied in that book who bought their homes in the late 70&#039;s and early 80&#039;s with people interested in purchasing a home today.  I would venture to guess that most of those people in the book bought their home with 20% down which they had saved for over many years.  They likely held the same job or changed jobs very infrequently over their careers.  

That doesn&#039;t reflect the society we live in today.  How long do people stay at the same job or even career nowadays?  I agree with the point of hyper-consumerism preventing the advancement of wealth, and that is the serious problem that America faces today.  I honestly don&#039;t think this recovery will play out the same as any previous one.  I think we&#039;re in a very unique, once-in-a-lifetime situation that will not be solved by some government stimulus.  In fact, that will only make matters worse.

Nathan mentioned Cash For Clunkers.  Many of the people who cashed in a gas-guzzling American car, did so for a more fuel efficient and reliable Japanese car.  Since Toyota owners have an 80% loyalty rate, Detroit just lost current and future customers.  So, the government help that Detroit automakers lobbied for is going to simply put another nail in their coffin.  Be careful what you wish for!

I&#039;ll say it again.  Buy a home for half-off peak or plan on living there for a (very?) long time.  That&#039;s actually as optimistic as I can be right now.  Sorry, Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JtR,</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s your request that I stay away from your blog, just ask.  I&#8217;m not a realtor, and I have no beef with you or the information that you provide.  I find it all very enlightening, your data and stories as well as the feedback from your followers.</p>
<p>If my posts come as an attempt to contradict your views or put you down, that&#8217;s not my intention.  I&#8217;m seeing things from a different perspective and trying to express my views and feelings in order to gain feedback from you and others that follow you.</p>
<p>Ross&#8217; statement from &#8216;The Millionair Next Door&#8217; is from a very different era, and this points to the core of my feelings on this subject.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a fair comparison to single out the people studied in that book who bought their homes in the late 70&#8217;s and early 80&#8217;s with people interested in purchasing a home today.  I would venture to guess that most of those people in the book bought their home with 20% down which they had saved for over many years.  They likely held the same job or changed jobs very infrequently over their careers.  </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t reflect the society we live in today.  How long do people stay at the same job or even career nowadays?  I agree with the point of hyper-consumerism preventing the advancement of wealth, and that is the serious problem that America faces today.  I honestly don&#8217;t think this recovery will play out the same as any previous one.  I think we&#8217;re in a very unique, once-in-a-lifetime situation that will not be solved by some government stimulus.  In fact, that will only make matters worse.</p>
<p>Nathan mentioned Cash For Clunkers.  Many of the people who cashed in a gas-guzzling American car, did so for a more fuel efficient and reliable Japanese car.  Since Toyota owners have an 80% loyalty rate, Detroit just lost current and future customers.  So, the government help that Detroit automakers lobbied for is going to simply put another nail in their coffin.  Be careful what you wish for!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say it again.  Buy a home for half-off peak or plan on living there for a (very?) long time.  That&#8217;s actually as optimistic as I can be right now.  Sorry, Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beachbaby</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22520</link>
		<dc:creator>beachbaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22520</guid>
		<description>Did ocrenter just say there actually was lots of money sitting on the sidelines. Thats about the biggest 180 of the year. Sacrilegious I say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did ocrenter just say there actually was lots of money sitting on the sidelines. Thats about the biggest 180 of the year. Sacrilegious I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3clicks from da beach</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22518</link>
		<dc:creator>3clicks from da beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22518</guid>
		<description>That book is on my nightstand. I&#039;m a PAW, but this house is dragging me down just a bit :D

Location, location, location rings true. Though I can&#039;t get a comp because the nearest REO is on again and off again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That book is on my nightstand. I&#8217;m a PAW, but this house is dragging me down just a bit <img src='http://www.bubbleinfo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Location, location, location rings true. Though I can&#8217;t get a comp because the nearest REO is on again and off again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim the Realtor</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim the Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22517</guid>
		<description>Ronald McMansion,

Will you ever give me a break?

I let you pour your constant barrage of negativity here, and it is non-stop.  The one day I have a slight ray of sunshine isn&#039;t going to get by you, oh no, you bring more.

You are either a competing realtor trying to take me out, or the most negative person in the world. I hope I never meet you, because I don&#039;t want whatever you got, to get on me.

All anonymous too - why don&#039;t you start your blog of negativity and work your tail off at getting the word out, instead of riding my coattails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald McMansion,</p>
<p>Will you ever give me a break?</p>
<p>I let you pour your constant barrage of negativity here, and it is non-stop.  The one day I have a slight ray of sunshine isn&#8217;t going to get by you, oh no, you bring more.</p>
<p>You are either a competing realtor trying to take me out, or the most negative person in the world. I hope I never meet you, because I don&#8217;t want whatever you got, to get on me.</p>
<p>All anonymous too &#8211; why don&#8217;t you start your blog of negativity and work your tail off at getting the word out, instead of riding my coattails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA renter</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22515</link>
		<dc:creator>CA renter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22515</guid>
		<description>Neg-ams aren&#039;t the only problems, though.  There are many people with regular ARMs and I/O loans who are paying little or nothing toward principal balances, all while prices are dropping.

Additionally, I&#039;m thinking the &quot;shadow inventory&quot; is hidden in the &quot;defaulted, but haven&#039;t received a NOD&quot; category.  Been hearing more and more stories about people going for months, or even years, without paying a single cent, yet still haven&#039;t been foreclosed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neg-ams aren&#8217;t the only problems, though.  There are many people with regular ARMs and I/O loans who are paying little or nothing toward principal balances, all while prices are dropping.</p>
<p>Additionally, I&#8217;m thinking the &#8220;shadow inventory&#8221; is hidden in the &#8220;defaulted, but haven&#8217;t received a NOD&#8221; category.  Been hearing more and more stories about people going for months, or even years, without paying a single cent, yet still haven&#8217;t been foreclosed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald McMansion</title>
		<link>http://www.bubbleinfo.com/2009/10/01/foreclosures-down/comment-page-1/#comment-22514</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald McMansion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bubbleinfo.com/?p=4442#comment-22514</guid>
		<description>&quot;The same title company that is always quoted with the worst foreclosure news confirmed that in Encinitas, Rancho Santa Fe, and Carmel Valley the percentage of option-ARMs and neg-ams mortgages in effect were 5.5% of those mortgaged, and they manually read every trust deed recorded.&quot;

What&#039;s the percentage of homeowners who used their home as an ATM via HELOC?

These charts are why I don&#039;t think this will unfold like any previous bubble/recession recovery...

http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/09/30/krugman-and-the-pied-pipers-of-debt/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The same title company that is always quoted with the worst foreclosure news confirmed that in Encinitas, Rancho Santa Fe, and Carmel Valley the percentage of option-ARMs and neg-ams mortgages in effect were 5.5% of those mortgaged, and they manually read every trust deed recorded.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the percentage of homeowners who used their home as an ATM via HELOC?</p>
<p>These charts are why I don&#8217;t think this will unfold like any previous bubble/recession recovery&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/09/30/krugman-and-the-pied-pipers-of-debt/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2009/09/30/krugman-and-the-pied-pipers-of-debt/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
