Archive for July, 2009


Saturday, July 11th, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Vista Outlier

Remember this one, on the outskirts of North Vista?

2115 Vista Grande, Vista 92084

3 br/2.5 ba  1,996 sf

0.67-acre

SP: $725,000  6/05  (90% financed)

TS: $233,750  3/09  (back to bene WFB)

LP: $99,900  5/09

SP: $240,000 7/09 cash

They disclosed a bunch of non-permitted issues that the listing agent thought would take $60,000 to $100,000 to fix, but it didn’t stop somebody from paying almost 2.5 x list price!. 

Here’s a link to the youtube video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3S5hz3rHsk

Friday, July 10th, 2009 at 4:51 PM

More on Neg-Am Loans

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–For the third straight month, option adjustable-rate mortgages are generating proportionally more delinquencies and foreclosures than subprime mortgages, the scourge of the housing crisis.

A further acceleration of troubles among the loans could mean higher-than-expected losses for Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), as well as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s own insurance fund.

“The realization of the issues related to option ARMs is just beginning,” says Chris Marinac, director of research at Atlanta-based FIG Partners.

Known as Pick-A-Pays – a brand name popularized by Wachovia Corp. – the mostly adjustable-rate loans were typically issued to creditworthy homeowners, and allowed borrowers to make a range of monthly payments. The payment options include a partial-interest payment that adds the unpaid interest to the loan’s balance. On many of the loans, balances have risen while values of the underlying properties have plummeted amid the nationwide housing crisis.

As of April, 36.9% of the loans were at least 60 days past due, while 19% were in foreclosure, according to data from First American CoreLogic, a unit of Santa Ana, Calif.-based First American Corp. (FAF).

By contrast, 33.9% of subprime loans were delinquent as of April, while 14.5% were in foreclosure.

The loans are heavily concentrated in the worst-hit regions in the housing market, including California and Florida, making option-ARM borrowers inordinately vulnerable to declining property values.

Option ARMs account for a much smaller portion of outstanding mortgages than subprime loans, but they occupy substantial tracts of certain banks’ balance sheets.

San Francisco-based Wells Fargo holds a mountain of Pick-A-Pays, having acquired $115 billion of the loans in its purchase of teetering Wachovia Corp., which it agreed to buy late last year.

Due to complicated accounting rules, Wells Fargo assigns the loans a value of $93.2 billion, giving it room to absorb future losses on the loans. The bank, however, won’t say whether losses from the loans have risen beyond the firm’s original expectations.

The firm nonetheless said in May that borrowers accounting for 51% of its outstanding Pick-A-Pay balances made only the minimum payment.

“Our Pick-a-Pay customers have been fairly constant in their utilization of the minimum payment option,” Wells Fargo said in a corporate filing.

Wells Fargo declined to comment further.

JPMorgan, for its part, holds $40.2 billion in option ARMs that the bank acquired when it purchased most of Seattle-based Washington Mutual Inc., which collapsed last year.

The New York company also said in a filing that it has some exposure to an additional $46.5 billion in option ARMs sitting in complex off-balance-sheet entities.

JPMorgan declined to comment.

The FDIC could also face future losses due to rising problems with the loans. The regulator agreed to soak up most future losses from about $5 billion in option ARMs once held by Coral Gables, Fla.-based BankUnited, which the FDIC seized and sold to private investors. The FDIC did not respond to a request for comment.

Troubles among option ARMs could well get worse, since the bulk are due to “recast” – industry lingo for reset – over the next three years or even earlier.

Most of the loans reset to a traditional mortgage after five or 10 years, depending on the contract. But borrowers can trigger an earlier recast if the loan’s balance exceeds the property’s value by a predetermined ratio – usually 110% or 125%.

Whereas subprime delinquencies have started to taper off, option ARMs’ worst troubles may yet lie ahead.

“We’re just beginning to enter the cycle of resets” on option-ARM loans, says Matt Stadler, chief risk officer of National Asset Direct Inc.

Senior lawmakers are also taking note of the looming storm.

In late June, 20 U.S. senators, including Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to address the issue.

The senators asked Geithner whether he could assure the public that loan servicers are prepared for a “potential onslaught of requests for modifications” from option-ARM borrowers.

 -By Marshall Eckblad, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4306; marshall.eckblad@dowjones.com

Friday, July 10th, 2009 at 4:03 PM

The JtR Story, Part 2

Friday, July 10th, 2009 at 8:00 AM

Recourse Loans Being Pursued?

When that article about the blog was syndicated, it ran in the newspaper in Bend, Oregon, and we’ve picked up some friends since.

Bob sent this in from the latest edition of the same paper, evidence that looks like Citi is going after those who owe a balance on their mortgage:

Published: July 06. 2009
Civil Suits
Deschutes County Circuit Court Civil Log
Cases involving less than $50,000 are subject to mandatory arbitration
Filed June 22
09CV0640ST: Citibank South Dakota NA v. Todd R. Meredith, complaint, $12,567.15
09CV0641AB: Citibank NA v. Jeffrey D. Evans, complaint, $99,960.50
09CV0642ST: CitiMortgage Inc. v. Lisa M. Solomon, complaint, $42,259.79
09CV0643AB: CitiMortgage Inc. v. Ramon Salcedo Jr., complaint, $71,126.88
09CV0644MA: CitiMortgage Inc. v. Lara Wettig, complaint, $60,054.39
09CV0645MA: CitiMortgage Inc. v. Michele Ann Sprando, complaint, $60,705.39

We don’t know for sure what these are, but the CitiMortgage suits look mortgage-related, and they aren’t the normal foreclosure postings.  No surprise that they are trying to collect money owed them – I think we can expect future recourse-loan deficiencies to be pursued.

Friday, July 10th, 2009 at 5:39 AM

Soil/Drainage Issues

If it isn’t bad enough just trying to find a decent house for a decent price these days, once you find one, you need to grapple with additional issues.

This note was left in the comment section of a youtube video on Carlsbad McMansions:

I’ve done lots of work for class action lawsuits in Carlsbad where many of these Mc Mansions were built on fill or in areas with substantial groundwater issues. I’d be wary of buying anything in Carlsbad without getting a reputable geologist to sign off on the property as sound and stable. Being told they need to cough up $100k+ for repairs tends to make some people very angry. Make sure and research class action lawsuits in the development you are interested in BEFORE you put in an offer.

Here’s a supplemental video:

Thursday, July 9th, 2009 at 11:17 AM

June Sales (+Actives)

The prime-time selling season runs from Super Bowl Sunday to the Fourth of July. How has your area been doing?

We should start seeing some of the unsuccessful sellers figure it out, and either cancel their listing, or lower their price over the next 30-45 days.

Here are the active detached listings for each area, the percentage of them that have been on the market for 90 days or more, the June Y-O-Y closings, and the change percentage in sales:

Town or Area Zip Code ACT %90+ SOLD June 08/09 % chg.
Cardiff 92007 45 38%
5/2
-60%
Carlsbad NW 92008 69 45%
15/13
-13%
Carlsbad SE 92009 133 29%
35/39
+11%
Carlsbad NE 92010 37 38%
8/15
+88%
Carlsbad SW 92011 95 39%
17/13
-24%
Del Mar 92014 141 70%
10/12
+20%
Encinitas 92024 190 68%
37/36
-5%
La Jolla 92037 293 48%
15/20
+33%
O-side W. 92054 68 21%
31/20
-35%
O-side S. 92056 63 20%
48/50
+4%
O-side N. 92057 95 28%
48/45
-6%
Poway 92064 120 52%
36/42
+17%
RSF both 345 62%
12/4
-67%
San Mrcs N. 92069 51 20%
31/28
-10%
San Mrcs S. 92078 80 26%
41/47
+15%
Solana Bch 92075 82 32%
5/7
+40%
Vista S. 92081 50 16%
24/20
-17%
Vista M. 92083 33 13%
20/29
+45%
Vista N. 92084 82 38%
22/30
+36%
Sorrento 92121 7 14%
4/5
25%
West RB 92127 164 74%
40/35
-13%
RB 92128 86 26%
40/44
+10%
RP 92129 48 13%
30/32
+7%
Carmel Vly 92130 217 75%
39/31
-21%
Scripps Rch 92131 71 20%
19/30
+58%

In bold: Triple-digit active listings, with more than half of those on the market for more than 90 days, and double-digit drop in Y-O-Y sales (beware!)

In italics:Actives = 10x last month’s solds (beware!)

Look at Rancho Santa Fe: 345 actives, and four sales last month! 86-month inventory!

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009 at 12:01 PM

We’re Number One!

Mortgage fraud-related Suspicious Activity Reports referred to law enforcement increased 36% to 63,713 during 2008, compared to 46,717 reports in 2007, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s 2008 Mortgage Fraud Report.

While the total dollar loss attributed to mortgage fraud is unknown, financial institutions reported losses of at least $1.4 billion, an increase of 83.4% from 2007. The report showed that more than 3.1 million foreclosure filings were reported on approximately 2.3 million properties nationally during 2008, up 81% from 2007 and 225% from 2006. As of 2008, the Western region of the U.S. had the most pending FBI mortgage fraud-related investigations.

According to the FBI’s report, the top 10 mortgage fraud states for 2008 were California, Illinois, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Colorado, Maryland, Florida, Missouri and New York. Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia were newly identified as having significant mortgage fraud problems.