Archive for June, 2009


Saturday, June 13th, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Rents

You could make a case on both sides of the rental market.

On one hand: you could say that buying a home is still an expensive proposition, and the uncertainty ahead would keep the tenant pool brimming.

On the other hand: current tenants may be buying homes to live in, plus the return of investors buying homes to rent have increased the supply of available rentals.

The U-T’s article today says that vacancy is up, and the average rents were slightly lower Y-O-Y:

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jun/13/1b13rent2182-county-landlords-bitten-recession/?business&zIndex=115895

An excerpt:

The ongoing recession is placing a strain on the region’s landlords, as tenants double up to save money or abandon the rental market to take advantage of bargains on foreclosed homes.

The latest half-yearly survey from the San Diego County Apartment Association shows a 5.4 percent vacancy rate for the region, a rise of 1.8 percentage points from its fall 2008 survey and 0.6 points from a year earlier.

As tenants seek out rentals with lower rates, properties less than six years old reported the highest number of vacancies in the recent survey. Complexes more than 25 years old had the highest occupancies.

The average rental rate countywide was up slightly to $1,192 from $1,188 in the fall 2008 survey, but down 0.7 percent from a year ago, when the average was $1,201. The average was mathematically weighted to take into account the dominance of one-and two-bedroom units in the marketplace.

The survey, which was mailed to nearly 6,000 rental property owners and managers throughout the county, received responses representing more than 33,000 units. Michelle Slingerland, spokeswoman for the association, blamed higher vacancies on high unemployment.

“Historically, the job market affects vacancy rates,” Slingerland said. “People are having to take on roommates or they are moving in with family. If supply increases, rental rates will go down accordingly.”  

Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Mid-Year Reports

There were a couple of panel discussion this week, one at USD, and the other sponsored by USC.

USD’s Mid-Year Economic Update provided some rather revealing scientific quotes:

“When the history is written, historians and economists will decide Wiley Coyote was really the mascot of the last eight years or so,” he said. “Both in terms of strapping ourselves to the housing rocket to get out of the last recession and unfortunately, Wiley Coyote always ends up in the same place: able to sustain hanging over the cliff as long as he doesn’t look down.”

“I think, out of 10,000 economists, maybe a dozen foresaw this,” he said.  “On behalf of all of us, sorry, we were wrong.”

http://www.sddt.com/News/article.cfm?SourceCode=20090611czg

***************************************************************************

The USC Marshall School of Business sponsored their Southern California Real Estate Mid-Year Report on Wednesday night.  There were several speakers, including J. Bradley Forrester of The ConAm Group, Gregory R. Hillgren, President, CALVEST Realty Advisors, Inc., Gary H. London, President, The London Group Realty Advisors, and John P. Wickenhiser, Senior VP, Wells Fargo Real Estate Group.

Hat tip to T who was in attendance, and filed this report:

1.  San Diego has the 2nd lowest vacancy rate in the nation, behind Washington DC.  In addition, San Diego was the first to crash and seems to be the first to correct.  Keep an eye on San Diego to find out how the rest of the coastal communities (SoCal?) will follow.

2.  The 3 panelists who are/were investors, liquidated 75%-80% of their real estate holdings from 2005-2007.  They are hesitant to buy, but are definitely looking.

3.  The investors are primarily looking at multifamily complexes (apartments).  The reason being is that in the 1994 crash, there was a lot of extra space built out and it took a long time to fix the cycle.  In preparation for this real estate boom, many builder relied heavily  on options that gave them the ability to quickly halt construction.  In 2006, that’s exactly what happened and construction has not picked up.  In 12 month, construction is expected to pick up slowly with new home/apt phases slowly being introduced in 2011.  They all expect the new 18-34 yr olds to have a shortage of rentals and expecting a “landlords” market from 2010-2013 (one guy said it could be 2010-2015 or even 2020 depending on how agressively construction happens).

4.  When builders start building residences again (12 months), then lenders will start lending again.  Finance should be more available by 2013.

5.  One dude (Hillgren) was pretty nervous about how Sacramento is going to take the recession.  He is generally worried about what taxation laws will go into effect on real estate investments and would like to figure out Sacramento’s direction before investing again.

********************************************************************

Here’s JtR’s Mid-Year Report:

Demand for housing has been strong all year, and especially since the beginning of March when interest rates dropped under 5%.  Mortgage money is readily available to those who qualify under the traditional underwriting guidelines, and prices of homes that are selling are lower than they used to be.

There are major concerns:

1.  Buyers are somewhat paralyzed by the anticipation of new bank-owned inventory coming to market in the near future.  Yet banks have been very tight, dribbling out new listings little by little.  The standoff has kept sales activity lower than it could be, and once listed, any quality REOs should sell just because their price is likely to be attractive.

2.  Sellers (and listing agents) who list high and wait for the lucky sale, are faced with diminishing returns.  Not only are there very few lucky sales, the longer a house loiters on the market, the chance of it selling plummets.  Yet sellers (and their agents) are slow to read the market signals, and many end up not selling, or renting it instead.  The likelihood of them being undermined in the near future by more-motivated sellers nearby is extremely high.  The seller’s ego wants to chalk it up to, “it wasn’t meant to be”, and most agents do nothing to dissuade them.  There will be tough lessons ahead for both.  Have the ability to hold out long-term?  Great, plan on it.

3.  Rising interest rates have the ability to squash any momentum.  They have the same effect as rising prices, because buyers will have to pay more to buy the same thing.  In this environment, buyers will be reluctant to endure that, and will instead have one more reason to not buy.

4. Divorce is rampant – it is everywhere, creating more supply.

5. The number of long-time owners who are selling is surprising too, far higher than I would have anticipated.  it was mentioned here last year that I thought by now that REOs and short sales would be the only homes offered for sale.  But there are many long-term equity sellers trying to sell.

6. Will there be enough buyers to soak up the supply?  Nobody knows, but I’m looking forward to the second half of the year.  If the banks would smarten up and unleash some, or most, of their inventory during the peak selling seasons, I think they be surprised at how many buyers are waiting.

Though the second half of the year should enjoy more sales, the 4Q08 inventory was lacking in quality homes.  If all that comes on the market is more junk, the standoff will extend – buyers are focused on both price and quality, and are resistant to compromise on either.

What’s your report?

Thursday, June 11th, 2009 at 3:37 PM

Lot for Sale

What a difference three years makes:

This owner had to be anticipating that the finished homes would sell for $1 million-plus.

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009 at 7:00 PM

2nd Quarter Contest

The second quarter is wrapping up quick, so a great chance to win!

Guess the number of detached sales in San Diego for 2Q09. 

For the tie-breaker, take a stab at the average $$-per-sf too. 

Here are the stats from the last few years:

Year # of Sales $$/sf
2000 6,620 $174.86
2001 6,358 $196.19
2002 7,358 $221.47
2003 7,371 $254.73
2004 7,960 $377.54
2005 7,724 $361.65
2006 5,767 $368.96
2007 4,899 $357.88
2008 5,020 $278.15

So far there have been 4,240 detached closings in 2Q09, at an average of $219.02/sf. There are also 3,405 detached listings that were marked pending between March 1st and May 31st.

We’ll take the final tally on July 23rd, to allow for the late-reporters. Because the Padres will likely be buried in the division by then, we’ll have a different prize for the closest guess.

One of horse-racing’s professional handicappers is a friend of the blog, and has generously donated a set of SIX tickets for his prime box seats overlooking the finish line at the DMTC.

The contest winner gets a day at the track at Del Mar!

(Date to be arranged, but we can probably accomodate your schedule)

We’ll take guesses until Friday night, June 12th.

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Do Lower Rates Help Recasts?

Business Week had this article in April entitled “Good News: Option ARMs Resets Delayed”, which included the latest Credit Suisse chart on recasting neg-ams: 

http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/apr2009/bw20090416_103126.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Housing Bubble added the extra text and graphics to help explain the chart (above), and included it on his post today.  His point is that not only are there many homeowners sitting on neg-ams about to recast, but many specuvestors used them to purchase flips that are now unable to sell:

http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/financing-the-flipping-dream-alt-a-mortgages-and-california-mortgage-equity-giants-number-one-alt-a-owner-occupied-state-is-california-say-what-alt-a-and-pay-option-arms-fueled-out-of-state-bu/#postcomment

***********************************************************************************

Let examine what happens when an option-arm recasts – DO TODAY’S LOWER RATES HELP?

Here’s an example using the terms that CHL used for non-owner occupied option-arm loans:

$500,000 loan

1.375% start rate (teaser rate)

9.95% life cap

115% of original loan = maximum limit of loan balance

3.025% margin over MTA (which in July, 2005 was 2.737 + 3.025 = 5.762%)

Recast every five years, or at 115%

An option-arm/neg-am borrower has the choice of paying the minimum payment, based on the teaser rate, or the “fully-indexed” rate, which is the index + margin:

1.375% payment = $1,689.84

5.762% payment = $2,921.68

Difference = $1,231.84

If the borrower only makes the minimum payment, the $1,231.84 is added to the loan balance.

I plotted the monthly payments in our example using the actual monthly MTA rates, and added the index to compute where the loan balance would be today.  Coincidentially, the rising loan balance would be hitting the 115% mark, or $575,000, right about now – if the borrower only made the minimum payment.

What would today’s new payment be after recast?    $2,823.61

May’s minimum payment?   $2,106.65

The increase in monthly payment after recasting would be $716.96 per month. 

Even with lower rates, that’s a hefty increase for a rental property, especially one with a long-term lease, – the difference will be coming out of the borrower’s pocket.

Owner-occupants might cough up the difference, in order to save the home they live in, but will tenants ante up more rent when their lease expires?  Not likely, and the landlords aren’t going to enjoy the pain long-term, unless they are really committed to saving their credit score.

The $716.96 is the difference at recast on a beginning loan balance of $500,000, you can extrapolate to determine what this means for those at higher price points.

If lenders would waive the recasts, this problem could be averted.  But I haven’t heard of any.

 

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009 at 9:30 AM

“AIG Curse”

Today’s L.A. Times is reporting that the St. Regis Monarch Beach in Dana Point is close to being foreclosed – their third mortgage of $70 million is in default:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-numonarch10-2009jun10,0,7571143.story

An excerpt:

Business is so bad — and funding so expensive — that hardly any hotels are being sold these days, and most are now worth 50% to 80% less than at the peak, said hotel broker Alan X. Reay of Atlas Hospitality Group in Costa Mesa.

Just this week, Sunstone Hotel Investors Inc. said it would turn the trendy W Hotel in downtown San Diego over to its lenders, part of a growing trend that Reay said was a “bloodbath.”

The St. Regis — which has several restaurants, a golf course and a private beach club — has been hit by a steep drop in bookings, according to the people with knowledge of the situation.

Built by the Makarechian development family of Newport Beach, the property is current, for now, on two other mortgages totaling $230 million on the 400-room hotel and golf course, these people said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation.

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009 at 7:32 AM

Carlsbad’s May Sales Review

People wonder about today’s homebuyers – how are they affording these prices? 

Most are using a larger down payment.

A check of the tax rolls showed 91 sales of Carlsbad SFRs in May.

Down payments:

All-cash = 9

50-99% = 8

30-49% = 22

21-29% = 11

20%  = 21

0-19% = 20

Total = 91

Seventy-one of 91, or 78% of the buyers used at least a 20% down payment.

Hopefully with homeowners having more skin in the game we’ll see more stability in the future.

***********************************************************************

Those that were selling were an interesting group:

Bank-owned homes = 19

Sold less than loan amount (non-REO) = 17

These amounted to 40% of the total, and if you take out the ten brand-new homes, 44% of the resales were either bank-owned or short.

Here are a few examples of those that sold:

7332 Circulo Papayo

5 br/4.5 ba, 4,225sf

Fees = $340/mo.

SP: $1,157,500  6/05

SP: $830,000  5/09

This had listed in September for $975,000, and eventually followed the market down.  We had seen this one in February -  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7tmiDrRj8g

***********************************************************************

6836 Citrine

4 br/4.5 ba, 4,913 sf

Fees = $588/mo.

SP: $1,332,000  5/06

SP: $855,000  5/09

This backed to Alicante, the main artery street, and had quite a slope in back.  It had a number of offers, and had fallen out of escrow a couple of times – but still sold over the list price of $849,000.

*********************************************************************

7153 Tern

4 br/3.5 ba, 3,510sf

Fees = $159/mo.

SP: $1,400,000  4/06

SP: $825,000  5/09

This probably surprised some folks at the bank – they had listed for $929,900 at the end of December, but it didn’t sell until they got the list price down to $829,900.  The loans had been $1,260,000.

*********************************************************************

3267 Sitio Tortuga

3 br/2.5 ba, 4,053sf

Fees = $446/mo.

LP: $925,000  2/09

SP: $750,000  5/09

KBHome’s model home in the Dolcetto tract in La Costa Ridge.  It must have been a long road home, this was built in 2006.  Still marked pending too.

***********************************************************************

6959 Goldstone

3 br/2.5 ba  2,766sf

Fees = $466

SP: $977,500  5/06 (new)

SP: $725,000  5/09

Another in La Costa Greens that had to be disappointing for the sellers, although this looks like it was a corporate relocation. 

Their remarks: WOW! YOU WON’T BELIEVE YOUR EYES JUST REDUCED TO $799,000!!! THIS HOME IS BEAUTIFUL!!!!!   Upgrades galore, completely landscaped front & back! Experience La Costa Greens at it’s best! Simply GORGEOUS INSIDE & OUT! Attention to every detail! EXQUISITE limestone, travertine & custom distressed hardwood flooring throughout! FABULOUS relaxing master suite w/retreat room on 1st level, INCREDIBLE 2nd story gameroom! Corporate Owned.

*************************************************************************

5450 Los Robles

3 br/2 ba, 2,522 sf

Fees = $0

SP: $625,000 3/02

SP: $1,000,000 5/09

Some ocean view from upstairs in this older (1976) home in Terramar just a block from the beach.  This wasn’t on the open market, but the price still feels like retail, and keeps my hopes alive that this neighborhood might survive the coffee bet.

****************************************************************************

Of all the 91 reviewed that had previous sales prices from 2002 and 2003, there weren’t any that sold for less than 2003.  There also seems to be somewhat of a floor around the FHA limit of $697,500, it’s just a matter of how much house you get, and what location, for $700,000 to $800,000.  I think we’ll see many more of the over-4,000sf McMansions slide into this category.