Monday, April 20th, 2009 at 9:14 PM
More Shadow Inventory by Zip
Here are others:
| Town or Area | Zip Code | FRadar | FR In MLS | Net ‘Shadow’ | MLS Act | % Inventory Incr. |
| PB/MB | 92109 | |||||
| West RB | 92127 | |||||
| East RB | 92128 | |||||
| Rancho Pen | 92129 | |||||
| Mira Mesa | 92126 |
It’ll be interesting to watch these numbers over the next few months, but at this point it seems safe to say, “Foreclosures for everyone!”



“Foreclosures for everyone!”
Not ponies, but maybe room for them!
tj and the bear | April 20th, 2009 at 11:03 pmWoohoo! Foreclosures for everyone!
greenlander | April 21st, 2009 at 12:44 amI guess I shouldn’t be surprised about 92126, but… poop.
Kwaping | April 21st, 2009 at 6:37 amThank you. You rock Jim.
Doofensmirtz | April 21st, 2009 at 7:31 amNo wonder they are going to come back since they evaporated just as fast from the market.
SD Transplant | April 21st, 2009 at 9:09 am92121?
Stephen Waits | April 21st, 2009 at 9:29 amWhat about Oceanside?! Thanks.
sdshoper | April 21st, 2009 at 11:53 amwhat about clairemont? there is no inventory there!
woohoo | April 21st, 2009 at 2:10 pmHow about 92026 & 92069??
JACKQLYN | April 21st, 2009 at 2:40 pmThanks for adding Rancho Penasquitos. This MLS number approximates the SDLookup number, but I’ve noticed Redfin has many more listed (even after removing the foreclosures, etc). Does anyone know why there is the discrepancy?
WaitingToExhale | April 22nd, 2009 at 10:59 amMine are detached only?
Jim the Realtor | April 22nd, 2009 at 11:10 am