web metrics

Archive for August, 2007


Tuesday, August 28th, 2007 at 8:54 PM

ARM-Reset Chart, BofA

resetbigchart.gif

BofA Analyst: Mortgage correction just ‘tip of the iceberg’

Robert Lacoursiere, an analyst with Bank of America, is not drinking any corporate Kool Aid. In a recent report, he said losses on home loans will peak in the second half of 2008.

He starts with this:

• Mortgage borrowers are in a weaker position than in the last cycle with less equity cushion, higher levels of income devoted to debt servicing and facing higher rates in the upcoming waves of rate resets.
• Meanwhile softening housing market makes repayment by sales an unlikely option, setting the stage for loss severities last seen in the early ‘90s.

He delves deeper into the reset issue:

According to BofA’s estimates, approximately $515 billion of ARMs are scheduled to reset in ’07, followed by approximately $680 billion in ’08. Furthermore, of these ARMs, we estimate that subprime loans consist of $400 billion (78%) in ’07 and $500 billion (73%) in ’08.

Recently released data from Fannie Mae (FNM) confirms our view that ARM resets will lead to higher rates of credit deterioration, particularly for 2/28 subprime ARMs. … Of the subprime ARMs that reset in 2006, 76% of borrowers were able to successfully pay off their loan (either through refinancing or selling their home). However, of the borrowers that did not pay off their loan 50% went bad (delinquent, in foreclosure or REO). According to FNM, subprime ARM borrowers facing resets in ’06 on average faced a 250 bps (2.5 percentage points) contract rate increase. Meanwhile, though the data is only as of March ’07, of all the subprime ARMs scheduled to reset in ‘07, already 18% have gone bad (delinquent, in foreclosure or REO) or 29% of loans that have not been paid off. As a larger number of loans will hit the reset throughout the rest of the year and ’08, and due to less favorable market conditions (higher rates, tightened underwriting standards, already stretched borrowers, and home price stagnation) the delinquency ratio will only increase from the 1Q07 level.

Thanks to Bank of America and CalculatedRisk

Thursday, August 16th, 2007 at 7:09 PM

More Babble

DataQuick analyst John Karevoll interpreted the prices and sales as a sign that San Diego real estate may be nearing the bottom of the post-boom period.

“Most of the declines in San Diego have happened,” Karevoll said. “Now it appears to be re-establishing a balance that we have yet to see for the (Southern California) region.”

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20070814-9999-1n14prices.html

************************************************************

Near-Term Home Sales to Hold in Modest Range
WASHINGTON, August 08, 2007 -

The housing market will probably hold close to present levels in the months ahead, according to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors®.

Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist, said he isn’t looking for any notable changes in sales activity. “Existing-home sales should be relatively stable over the next few months, holding in a modest range, with some pent-up demand growing from buyers who’ve been on the sidelines,” he said. “Mortgage disruptions will hold back sales over the short term, but long-term fundamentals are favorable. A modest upturn is projected for existing-home sales toward the end of the year, with broader improvement to include the new-home market by the middle of 2008.”

Existing-home sales are forecast at 6.04 million in 2007 and 6.38 million next year, below the 6.48 million recorded in 2006. New-home sales are expected to total 852,000 this year and 848,000 in 2008, down from 1.05 million in 2006. Housing starts, including multifamily units, are likely to total 1.43 million in 2007 and 1.40 million next year, below the 1.80 million units started in 2006.

“With the population growing, the demand for homes isn’t going away – it’s just being delayed,” Yun said. “More buyers, and cutbacks in new construction, will eventually draw down the inventory levels and support future price appreciation, but general gains will be modest next year. Serious buyers today have a long-term view of housing as an investment – speculators have left the market.”

Existing-home prices should ease by 1.2 percent to a median of $219,300 in 2007 before rising 2.0 percent next year to $223,600. The median new-home price will probably fall 2.3 percent to $240,800 in 2007, and then rise 2.3 percent next year to $246,300.

Thursday, August 16th, 2007 at 7:07 PM

What a Joke

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Inman News

It has been a busy letter-writing week for the National Association of Realtors.

The trade group for about 1.3 million Realtors announced Wednesday that it sent a letter urging the Federal Reserve System Board of Governors “to adopt regulations that combat unfair, deceptive and abuse mortgage lending acts and practices” in light of “the collapse of several investment funds and the failure of more than 100 subprime lenders.”

Pat V. Combs, the association’s president, said in a statement, “The Fed must act responsibly to protect consumers, and NAR pledges its support. We champion the principle that all mortgage originators should act in ‘good faith and with fair dealings’ in all transactions.”

Earlier in the week, the Realtor group joined with the Mortgage Bankers Association and the National Association of Home Builders trade groups in a letter to the U.S. Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight that urges that agency “to temporarily increase the caps on the investment portfolios of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with appropriate conditions, to help inject needed liquidity and stability into the mortgage market.”

The groups also stated in that letter, “The nation’s mortgage markets are facing a liquidity crisis of a force and magnitude not seen in decades. The chill will have far-reaching effects throughout the housing market if stability is not restored.”

NAR’s letter to the Fed, meanwhile, seeks a range of restrictions on lending practices, such as a ban or severe restrictions on the use of prepayment penalties for subprime mortgages. Such penalties can “haunt” homeowners when they try to refinance, Combs stated, and can have the impact of trapping homeowners into an undesirable mortgage.

The letter also urged the Fed to require that subprime lenders provide an escrow reserve for taxes and insurance, which “will protect borrowers from large payments they can’t afford and help insure they understand the total cost of their monthly mortgage,” Combs stated.

The group, which adopted a set of goals for responsible lending practices earlier this year, also is pushing the Fed board to mandate underwriting standards that require all mortgage originators to verify a borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and to ensure that “stated-income” and “low-doc” loans are used only sparingly.

Also among NAR’s Fed wish list:


  • Adopt anti-mortgage-flipping regulations that require lenders to verify that the new loan provides a significant benefit to the borrower;

  • Encourage lenders to use alternative credit histories for borrowers with little or no credit histories;

  • Require all institutional lenders to periodically report borrowers’ payment histories to at least three national credit bureaus;

  • Require lenders to offer borrowers mortgage choices with interest rates and fees that reflect the borrower’s credit risk;

  • Working with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, improve consumer mortgage disclosure under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

“NAR believes that existing guidelines are not enough to protect consumers, and is pleased that the Board has made the first step toward this rulemaking. However, we still believe that each state should retain the authority to adopt its own high standards,” Combs stated.


Monday, August 6th, 2007 at 5:18 PM

There Is No Reason to Panic


There is nothing wrong with your web browser. Northern San Diego County is still well covered by “Jim the Realtor.” The best way to do that is by making sure he and his family get a chance to get away for a few days. While sure to “peek” in over the next few days “Jim the Realtor” has wisely decided that the mundane be delegated. Let me introduce myself; Rob Dawg aka Robert Coté of EN. Okay, take a breath. I’m here to empty the trash and water the lawn not sell the furniture. I’ll use this occasion to discuss NorSD and any similarities/differences with my VenCo location. Contact me at techscan@yahoo.com if you have anything nasty to say. If you have anything nice, well… post here.
Next up: Demographics as desitiny.

Saturday, August 4th, 2007 at 4:50 PM

La Jolla to Encinitas Ratios

How’s the rest of North County doing? I’ve suggested that a good way to gauge the health of the market is to compare the number of active listings to the number of pendings, because over the last few years they have had an inverse relationship. When there were hardly any active listings, the sales were brisk, and when the inventory started to grow, sales slacked off.

Comparing over time gives us a sense of market direction. In the 2000-2004 time frame, the ratio of actives-to-pendings was around 2:1, with the hottest times as low as 1:1.

Scoring Guide

A-to-P Ratio Description
Under 3 Hot market
3-4 Regular market
4-5 Market in trouble
5-7 Too many choices, buyers are winning
7+ Freefall

The last time these were noted was June 30th – here is how that compares to today:

Local Town or Area June 30 Aug 3
Carmel Valley 2.75 2.88
Cardiff 3.08 3.17
La Jolla unk 4.85
Encinitas 4.08 4.91
Solana Beach 3.38 6.22
Del Mar 5.35 6.83
RSF 10.43 10.57

Carmel Valley is looking good so far, can it continue to beat the odds? Can you say the Ranch is in freefall, or is it different because of the ultra-wealthy being able to hold out?

The next six months will be interesting!

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007 at 3:24 PM

Buying a Home Today

A reader left this comment:

"We’re looking for our first home and are being hammered by realtors telling us to BUY, BUY, BUY while prices are "down" but it’s obvious they will continue to be "down". most of the homes we like are about 20-30% higher then we want to pay. 2 kids …. … not paying $4,000 a month for a mortgage….. I’ll continue to rent thank you! Rather then take the advice of a greedy sales tactic I feel like waiting a bit may give us the 20-30% drop we need. Am I on the right track?"

If you want to pay 20% to 30% less, you have two choices:

1. Wait.

2. Find the sellers who need to sell bad enough (and have the equity) that they’ll make that kind of deal with you.

There are buyers who will buy today at 20% to 30% less, it’s just hard to find the sellers at that level - almost all of them, and their agents, think by listing high and waiting will produce a lucky sale someday.

Have a good agent help you. 

Here’s what I do with buyers these days:

1.  Both the buyers and I keep looking for possiblities.

2.  When we find one, I check to see how much equity they have.

3.  We review comparable sales around it.

4.  We use aerial photography to judge location and lot size.

Based on those, we decide if it’s worth pursuing. 

If it is, then….

1.  I call listing agent and suggest a possible sale price to hear reaction.

2.  If it isn’t an absolute no, I go look at the property.

3.  I report back to buyers to see if it is worth a trip for them.

4.  If they like it, we review the best strategy to obtain it at the right price, and make an offer accordingly.

 

This approach helps minimize the inconvenience of searching for the real contenders.  There is probably only 1 out of 100 sellers who are willing, and able, to price their home aggressively.  The rest live in the fantasy of that dreamy ‘lucky-sale’ falling in their lap.  But some of those really need to move, and a good agent should be able to help find those motivated sellers, keeping your inconvenience to a minimum. 

 

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007 at 1:49 PM

‘Klinge’ pronounced

200px-Dorn_as_Worf.jpgWe pronounce it with a silent ‘e’.

"kling", like the klingons, although they are a little better-looking